Institutionalization of community managed drinking water supply programme and user level water quali
Water And Sanitation Management Organization (WASMO)
India

The Problem

Gujarat is a drought prone and water scarce State and 2/3rd area of the State has been facing acute water scarcity. Recurrent droughts and over-exploitation of groundwater resulted in water availability as well water quality issues across the State. As per the habitation survey of 2003, it was observed that more than 50% of the total habitations were either facing water availability issues or water quality problems. Citizens’ participation and feed back mechanisms were almost non-existent.

Prior to the initiative, water supply in rural areas was provided by Government agencies and the entire sector was supply driven. A rigid uni-disciplinary engineering bureaucracy gradually led to the ‘build–neglect–rebuild’ syndrome. Negligible community participation had resulted in a strong sense of complacency of the provider. The service was irregular, unable to meet the people’s requirements and inefficient. A typical bureaucratic response thwarted any accountability and feedback mechanism. As a result, user satisfaction was low, the people unwilling to pay the user charges and the entire service delivery was turning financially unviable.

Internal distribution within villages and habitations was almost non-existent. In several parts of the State, people had to travel long distances for getting a minimum quantity of drinking water. Household water connectivity was only a dream for the rural masses and only a few well-off families had access to it. Women and children, on whom the responsibility of fetching water for drinking and other household purposes lies, were the ultimate sufferers of this situation. Downtrodden communities and lower caste groups had specific issues of exclusion and equity in water availability.

A decentralised mechanism for in-village water distribution and management of the system was not established and community had little capacity and awareness in this regard. Absence of citizens’ engagement had been leading to lack of awareness of stakeholders and issues of exclusion, equity, gender. Monitoring of water quality at users’ level was almost absent due to lack of awareness as well as non-participation of users.. In spite of huge investments being made and infrastructure being created, the efforts were not sustainable and drinking water availability and quality issues, continued to trouble the sector. Water was to be supplied through tankers and even trains to a large number of villages. In the year 2001, 4054 villages were supplied water by tankers.

Empowerment of community and development of social capital, needed a totally different outlook for making the sector sustainable. The institution being nominated viz. Water and Sanitation Management Organization (WASMO) was established as a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) in May 2002 for effective citizens’ engagement in drinking water services in rural areas by bringing systemic changes for providing effective institutional framework for decentralized governance.

Solution and Key Benefits

 What is the initiative about? (the solution)
The initiative has been unique for the sector in terms of scaling up of reforms and its outcomes in terms of physical outreach as well as in terms of building social capital and effective microlinks for effective citizens’ engagement have been commendable. Community institutions in the form of Village Water and Sanitation Committees(VWSCs) have been formed in 13542 out of total 18600 (72%) villages in the State. 3736 villages have commissioned their water supply systems and are also looking after their Operation & Maintenance. Schemes are under implementation in another 3,800 villages. Strong partnerships have been formed with about 75 reputed Non-Government Organizations (NGOs). About 160 million population (50%) is now covered with household level tap water connectivity which is only about 12 percent at the country level (India). The service delivery is now being managed by community institutions in more than 2900 villages through regular tariff collection. Wasmo’s interventions have resulted in achieving more than 150 villages that are open defecation free and totally sanitized. Effective feedback systems including proactive consultation mechanisms with citizens have been evolved for ensuring efficient service delivery by the government supplier.

13,984 Village level Water Quality Monitoring Teams have been formed which are regularly monitoring the water safety at the users’ level. Over 21,625 Gram Mitras and 3500 ‘anaganwadi’ workers (under the Integrated Child Development Scheme) have been trained in water quality testing. Institutionalization of water quality monitoring was completed in 38000 schools and 5500 mid- day meal centres to ensure water safety along with regular follow-up.

The initiative has led to a sound partnership between the State and the people, with the community where the powers, resources and responsibilities have been transferred to the community leading to a paradigm shift in the role of governance from provider to facilitator. Local leadership has been groomed for taking on the responsibility of their own water supply. Participatory social processes and capacity building of community has resulted in building a strong social capital and a learning society at the grassroots level.

The initiative has enhanced the sense of ownership among the rural users. Improved services have resulted in user satisfaction and consequent payment of tariff for water supplied by Government agencies (tariff recoveries have seen phenomenal increase, even upto 10 times). Placing the programme in a public domain through a General Village Assembly, has been effective in developing micro-links for social audit, transparency and accountability, essential for good governance and long-term sustainability.

Several programme evaluation studies taken up through various independent organizations, interns and programme monitoring show that issues like inadequacy of water, traveling long distances, conflicts, long time for fetching water etc. have substantially reduced. Time taken for repairs has been reduced as there is little dependence on any external agency. The impact on women’s lives has been enormous. There has been marked improvement in issues of sanitation and hygiene at household level and behavior of school children. Many VWSCs have created surplus corpus of funds for O&M.

Actors and Stakeholders

 Who proposed the solution, who implemented it and who were the stakeholders?
Community engagement was seen as a solution for management of water supply systems and a few initiatives were taken by the State. But they did not meet with much success. The Royal Netherlands Embassy (RNE) sponsored Ghogha project in 82 villages of Bhavanagar district, envisioned as a community managed programme was unable to achieve its objectives. From 1996 to 2000, not even a single Village Water and Sanitation Committee could be formed. When this project was studied by a panel of experts appointed as a part of the Institutional Development Mission, their observation was that the typical Government machinery was not equipped to handle software matters related to the involvement and capacity building of people. The need for a special organisation having the required personnel and skills to handle community mobilisation and participatory planning.

A peer group at the level of Government of Gujarat visualised taking up reforms in a mission mode along with the externally aided (RNE) programme for rehabilitation and reconstruction of water supply infrastructure in areas affected by the earthquake of 2001 in Gujarat. The Secretary of water supply department and Joint Secretary (Projects), along with some reputed NGO’s working in the sector were instrumental in creating this Special Purpose Vehicle as an autonomous organization with non-conventional organisational structure for a mission mode. The initiative which started as a reforms process in two programmes was subsequently scaled up to cover the entire State.

A complex social structure and diversity in geography and natural resources posed several challenges while putting into practice a demand driven and process driven approach. Along with technical skills it called for social skills to work very closely with the community, understand their circumstances and build an environment of trust and transparency. The grassroots level implementation for bringing in institutional changes can be attributed to a workforce of committed young professionals, willing to think ‘out-of-the-box’ and take chances to innovate.

The primary stakeholder is the entire rural community of Gujarat facing acute water shortage and/or water quality issues. Among the rural community, the most important stakeholders have been the women and children, traditionally responsible for collection of water, as they undergo immense drudgery to fetch water, and face issues related to health, lack of education and opportunity cost. Families of lower caste groups in the villages, who usually remain excluded from development initiatives are another group of stakeholders at the community level.

Another important stakeholder is the NGO community in the State, working in the field of drinking water and water resource management. Involving NGOs as Implementation Support Agencies (ISA’s) has helped utilise their potential and capacities and brought in their vital experience of directly working with the community. The Community based organizations as well as the government utility are the other benefited stakeholders.

(a) Strategies

 Describe how and when the initiative was implemented by answering these questions
 a.      What were the strategies used to implement the initiative? In no more than 500 words, provide a summary of the main objectives and strategies of the initiative, how they were established and by whom.
Objectives

• To empower rural community through Village Water and Sanitation Committees to plan, approve, implement, operate and maintain their own water supply, manage water resource and ensure safe, reliable and adequate water supply throughout the year by engaging citizens’ in decision making.

• To work as a proactive facilitator and provide technical, social and financial support to VWSC’s and to build strong partnerships with NGO’s, other Government Institutions donors and UN and other organizations to strengthen local self governance for efficient service delivery.

• To encourage adoption of best hygiene practices and habitat improvement by taking up exhaustive IEC.


Strategies

• Formation of an autonomous organization with a non-conventional structure
• Creating institutions at the village level and strengthening them through continuous capacity building
• Focus on IEC and software activities before taking up development of infrastructure for water supply
• Putting entire programme in public domain for seeking strong citizens’ engagement
• Social Process based demand driven programme implementation for achieving five over-arching objectives, viz., stakeholder engagement, gaining public confidence, strong community leadership, accountability and efficient service delivery
• Building strong partnerships based on transparency and trust with community, community institutions and NGO’s.

The objectives and strategies were established by a PEER group of government officials and eminent persons working in the sector. After lot of consultations and groundwork, it was decided to bring transformation at three different levels.

The first level of institutional innovation was in the terms of the role of WASMO – being a facilitator rather than a provider- and in terms of the structure of WASMO. From the very beginning it was envisaged that WASMO would not be an implementing agency, but it would facilitate the rural communities to carry out the implementation and bring in administrative reforms for promoting transparency, accountability, equity and responsiveness in public service. WASMO’s unique organizational culture incorporates the best practices of the government, NGO and corporate organisations.

The second innovative mechanism was to build strong partnerships with NGOs based on clarity in roles and responsibility. This led to developing operational relationships, which recognize and capitalize on each others’ skills and strengths. Accountability, respect and trust have been the key elements for this synergy. NGOs have been selected through a structured process to act as implementation support agencies to the villages.

The third and most important institutional mechanism was to form VWSCs and take the programme in public domain wherein power to question and social audit lies with the village community. VWSC’s were also given constitutional authority by enacting a government resolution. It has been the endeavour of the mission to transfer funds, function and functionaries (3F’s) to village level institution through effective and proactive facilitation (4th F)


Networking with other government departments like health, education and rural development, consultation with them to aid decision making and converging individual efforts of departments, has helped to reach out to a wider target groups and integrating the water, sanitation, hygiene and health issue.

(b) Implementation

 b.      What were the key development and implementation steps and the chronology? No more than 500 words
The first key development was bringing administrative reforms for promoting transparency, accountabilityand responsiveness in public service. An innovative, forward looking, need based organization for facilitating reforms through strong social processes at community level was created for this purpose.

The second key development was at the village level, for empowerment of local community by forming VWSCs colloquially known as Pani Samitis. The Pani Samiti was also provided cConstitutional legitimacy and as a policy has mandatory representation from all sections of society and 1/3rd places reserved for women.

The scale (number of people), intensity (extent and enthusiasm), level of leadership and disabling factors differ from village to village and accordingly social processes are taken up for first 3-6 months in every village. During this crucial phase of the project cycle, the community is organised through different techniques of Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA), like social mapping, resource mapping, transect walk, interviews of key informants, group discussions and meetings at habitation level.

The village assembly, an important tool in eliciting community participation, facilitates decision making, resolving conflicts and building up transparency in the implementation process. It is a horizontal mechanism for policy making at the village level wherein, views of all groups are reflected and holistic planning for water supply systems can take place. It is mandatory for the VWSC to refer to the village assembly at six crucial stages viz., project acceptance, formation of the VWSC, finalizing the Village Action Plan (VAP), allocation of physical works to different parties, presenting the final accounts and setting water tariffs.

Since the implementation is taken care of by the community, capacity of VWSC is built on various aspects. Intensive and regular training on all aspects of project management and implementation enhances the confidence of the VWSCs and they are able to construct drinking water infrastructure that meets quality norms following transparent procedures. As per their capacities, the communities opt for either carrying out work entirely on their own, commissioning it to a contractor or a combination of both. The community monitors the construction activities. Since the communities pay a share (10%) in creation of the assets, they get closely involved in preparing the VAPand ensure that only genuinely required structures are created.

Some steps for transparency include social audit through village assembly, where every important decision taken by the VWSC is vetted and approved, release of subsequent installments after a technical and financial audit, display board at a prominent place in the village mentioning details of the scheme, duties of the VWSC, item-wise budget, estimated expenses and final expenses and audit of the VWSC accounts through appointed auditors

The ‘Atmarpan’ ceremony (dedication to self) is a unique system for commissioning the completed works, where all VWSC members take an oath to operate, maintain and manage the schemes in the presence of the entire community. On the principle of ‘users to pay’, tariff calculation for cost recovery of O&M, subsequent collection and management of the contributions is done by the people through consensus.

(c) Overcoming Obstacles

 c.      What were the main obstacles encountered? How were they overcome? No more than 500 words
Social Aspects
Pampered Societal Mentality
A centralised system of water supply for several years had caused over dependence of the villages on the supplier. Hence, a system where the community needs to pay towards capital costs was hardly acceptable, leave alone convincing the community to take over O&M of the entire system by paying tariff.

Complex socio-economic rural society
Caste structure, socio-economic status and age old beliefs of inequality make rural dynamics very complex. The powerful often try to hijack the entire system, the poorer sections may be excluded by not being informed/called for meetings or due to their inability to make a contribution (cash). There are some people who wait in the wings and disrupt the programme when it is mid-way. Bringing everyone on a common platform was a challenging task.

Gender and exclusion issues
In the patriarchal system, exclusion of women due to various reasons, from caste to low levels of literacy, to a general lower status in society, makes their participation in planning and developing water supply systems difficult.

These problems have been overcome through continuous dialogue with the people, development of local leadership, placing the programme in the public domain, visits to successful villages and other social processes.

Management Aspects
Years of dependence on the government for the O&M of water supply systems, led to the general belief that community may not be able to handle the management of water supply systems as it involves engineering aspects, financial issues etc. Thus, the community in general seemed to lack a management culture and confidence in its abilities was low.

Capacity building on O&M issues, record keeping, financial management and involving motivated village members (teachers, elders, youths, SHGs) etc. helped to prepare the community for O&M of systems and ensure transparency.

Financial Aspects
A timely and continuous flow of fund to the villages once work begins can establish the integrity of the facilitating agency. This was done by consciously deciding to bypass the taluka Panchayat and transferring the funds directly to the villages, in their separate bank accounts.

Willingness to pay and cost recovery for O&M of systems was considered as a key challenge for the sustainability of the village level systems. It has been possible to achieve this through generating understanding on sustainability issues from the beginning of the initiative, developing demand based systems and making service delivery efficient. The community being satisfied with the services is willing to pay.
Enthusiasm of community, project benefits and feedback, in turn compelled the State and Central Government to make sufficient allocation to scale up the programme.

Mindset within the Government
A shift in paradigm from provider to facilitator evoked substantial resistance within the government. Moulding the engineers towards community participation was difficult, while hiring fresh talent for community mobilization was considered an encroachment in their field. Continuous capacity building on social aspects of water supply, participatory processes, and working in a team mode with people having software skills, has been able to change the mindset of the engineers.

(d) Use of Resources

 d.      What resources were used for the initiative and what were its key benefits? In no more than 500 words, specify what were the financial, technical and human resources’ costs associated with this initiative. Describe how resources were mobilized
Financial resources have been mobilised from various organizations for this purpose, which are as under:

Funding Agency INR in million US $ million

Royal Netherlands 786.00 15.72
Embassy
Govt. of India, 2537.76 50.76
Rural Development
Govt. of India, 1251.92 25.04
Economic Affairs
Govt. of India 42.57 0.85
Tribal Affairs
Govt. of Gujarat 3704.75 74.10
Water Supply
Govt. of Gujarat 210.00 4.20
Tribal Development
Gujarat Water Board 224.14 4.48

Gujarat Industries Dept. 45.00 24.30
(for Salt Pan workers)

Gujarat, Urban 1.62 0.03
Development

Other Programmes/Sponsorship

UNICEF 18.97 0.38

WaterAid India 0.21 0.00

Rajasthan 1.59 0.03

Total 8824.54 199.89

In terms of human resource needed for proactive facilitator, WASMO has a multidisciplinary team with professionals from engineering, social work, management and finance, environmental sciences, communication and documentation. The composition is young and drawn from the open market on contract basis in a transparent manner. A large number of professionals are young and they are guided by relatively very senior professionals most of whom are on deputation from the government departments.Starting from a small team of 20 professionals, now ateam of 510 persons is working in the programme.

Community engagement being the central premise of all the programmes, WASMO’s staff structure lays great emphasis on professionals from the social sciences and communications background. About 38 per cent of the staff is from the field of social work, rural management, and development communication/journalism. About 37 per cent of the staff also has Masters degrees in various fields.

Since inception WASMO has established partnerships with organizations involved in rural development to work at grassroots level. The partnerships are built on a shared vision to address the basic need for drinking water. NGOs have been selected through a structured process of accreditation to act as Implementation Support Agencies (ISAs). Today there are more than 75 reputed NGOs associated with WASMO as ISAs.

The initiative has been successful due to strong partnerships with community leaderships who have volunteered for taking up the works in their villages for the benefit of the community. Partnership of the community is an outcome of the strong social processes at the village level.

Sustainability and Transferability

  Is the initiative sustainable and transferable?
The following issues have been of significance for sustaining the decentralized, community managed water supply programme:

i.) Sustainability of institutions: Institutions being developed at village level have been made sustainable by continuous capacity building programme, repeated discussions at Village Assembly level, continuous facilitation up to withdrawal from village level and taking up follow up initiatives even after withdrawal and facilitating support in case it is needed even after withdrawal by developing linkages to resources. It has been seen that the community is satisfied with the functioning of the VWSC and re-nominates the same people to the committees once the tenure is completed.

ii.) Social processes: The feeling of oneness and working for a common good cause has to be maintained over time among the community if the systems are to remain sustainable. Conflict resolution, empathy for the underprivileged groups, ‘water for all’ these themes are ingrained in the community during the first cycle. Moreover, once the community is satisfied with the services, this itself is a major driving force to resolve issues and sustain the systems

iii.) Sustainability of water sources: One of the major issues for sustainability of the systems is the sustainability of the source itself. Water resource management for drinking water security has been emphasized in the community managed programme. Groundwater recharge work, surface water storages, rooftop rainwater harvesting, maintenance of local sources, supplementation of deficit by piped water supply, conservation in use and conjunctive water use patterns are evolved in consultation with the community. The local wisdom of the people and their years of experience is taken into account while planning the WRM initiatives, which is able to make water supply sustainable.

iv.) Financial and Technical sustainability: The options evolved for the programme are socially acceptable, technically simple and financially viable which can be sustained within the means of the rural community. The options so provided are selected by the community and due to capacity building, financial computation and technical maintenance, the systems developed are proving to be sustainable.

The initiative is replicable and has been scaled up throughout the Gujarat State. Year-wise formation of VWSCs is as given below
:


Year No. of VWSCs Cumulative VWSCs
Formed formed

2002-03 82 82
2003-04 368 450
2004-05 334 784
2005-06 3293 4077
2006-07 4337 8414
2007-08 2234 10649
2008-09 2983 13542

WASMO’s approach is accepted as a model at the national level in India and in appreciation of the innovativeness, WASMO was conferred with the prestigious “Prime Minister’s Award for Excellence in Public Administration” for 2006-07

Lessons Learned

 What are the impact of your initiative and the lessons learned?
The most effective outcome of the initiative has been the emergence of effective local leadership, which has provided a social dimension to the entire issue. The local leadership has worked for mobilising the community and implementing the projects without any incentives. Social recognition and development of village environs have mostly been the motivational factors for these leaders. Capacity building of local leadership has resulted in building up a strong social capital that is responsive, accountable, transparent and active for addressing the water supply issues at users’ level.

Key elements for success:
High level of transparency, proactive facilitation, strong team effort by professionals of WASMO and NGOs, a professional organizational structure with emphasis on people with social sciences backgrounds, exhaustive IEC strategy, social process at village level, Village Assembly as a strong tool of social audit, clear partnership agreements with VWSCs and NGOs with regular follow-ups, full community control over finances, flexible approach for utilizing innovativeness and traditional knowledge of community, and direct facilitation of village level governance from one point for reduction of bureaucratic delays have been the main attributes for success of the initiative in this regard.

Breaking Myths
Several misconceptions about the rural communities and their capabilities to plan, implement and manage in-village infrastructure and development works have been have been put to rest. Gram Panchayats and the rural community have proved that they are:
1. able to bear responsibilities, implement construction meeting high standards of quality and
2. maintain financial discipline and transparency
3. willing to contribute towards capital costs for water supply systems as well as for the O&M of the systems
4. able to resolve conflicts and arrive at a consensus
5. able to understand issues related to water quality and safety upto users’ level
6. empathetic to socio-economic diversity and can plan systems that take care of the underprivileged and labour class
7. conscious about caring for traditional/local sources and using their water resources in a conservative and prudent manner
8. able to impose socially acceptable regulations for groundwater or surface water use so that drinking water supplies are sustainable.

The villages of Gujarat have also shown that women can take lead and participate actively, if provided the platform and the training. Women self help groups have been instrumental in this respect in several villages. In places, women have motivated the entire community for owning the system when the men were reluctant, while at other places women are operating the system.

Thus taking essential steps in order to facilitate decentralised governance through bottom-up approach, has helped establish a true democratic model of empowering community for efficient service delivery. The community led programme has been able to provide household level water connectivity to about 50 percent of the rural population in water scarce Gujarat State. The impact on health issues is tremendous due to users’ level water safety monitoring by community. The initiave has created a win-win situation for community as well as the Government.

Contact Information

Institution Name:   Water And Sanitation Management Organization (WASMO)
Institution Type:   Government Agency  
Contact Person:   Jaipal Singh
Title:   Chief Executive Officer  
Telephone/ Fax:   91-79-23247170-71
Institution's / Project's Website:   91-79-23247485
E-mail:   wasmo@wasmo.org  
Address:   Water And Sanitation Management Organization (WASMO)
Postal Code:   382010
City:   Gandhinagar
State/Province:   Gujarat
Country:   India

          Go Back

Print friendly Page