4. In which ways is the initiative creative and innovative?
|
The blueprint of the System was designed by the Directorate of General Insurance then IT Department of the Undersecretariat of the Treasury conducted necessary IT based works regarding creation and test of the System. Initially, only 5 nonlife and 2 life insurance companies took part in the System.To ensure proper working of the System, in 01.12.2010 complaint petitions taken via postal service were transmitted to the relevant companies without direct involvement of citizens. Later in 01.01.2011 all insurance companies and citizens have been given access to the System via website of the Undersecretariat of Treasury. In 01.01.2012, in addition to companies some institutions related to insurance market were integrated to the System.
|
|
5. Who implemented the initiative and what is the size of the population affected by this initiative?
|
All the development process of the System is implemented by the Undersecretariat of the Treasury However, the evaluation procedure of complaints within the System framework requires participation of the insurance companies and/or the institutions due to being addressee of the complaint.
|
6. How was the strategy implemented and what resources were mobilized?
|
Both the technical and human resources of the Undersecretariat of Treasury were quite sufficient for the development of the System so that it did not create a financial burden. Therefore, the System was developed totally by use of current resources within the Undersecretariat of Treasury.
|
|
7. Who were the stakeholders involved in the design of the initiative and in its implementation?
|
The System decreased the paperwork dramatically. Systematic data gathering on complaints became available owing to the formation of a database within the framework of the System. Hence, the System enabled the insurance authority, which is the Directorate of General Insurance, to figure out the issues on which complaints are concentrated. Since the application procedure evolved into an online form; It became easier, faster and cheaper for citizens to deliver their petition.
|
|
8. What were the most successful outputs and why was the initiative effective?
|
In order to ensure complaints to be evaluated properly and punctually by insurance companies and institutions, the System sends e-mails to the insurance companies and instituions’ staff responsible of the System including a vice general manager and a department manager. When a citizen or staff of insurance companies and institutions encountered a problem during the execution of the System, he/she has been directed to the personnel of the Directorate of General Insurance who initially tries to solve the problem by use of the tools available in the System if the personnel cannot provide a solution then the situation is reported to the IT Department of the Undersecretariat of the Treasury. Hence, both at design and execution stages of the System, the Directorate of General Insurance and the IT Department of the Undersecretariat of the Treasury have worked in cooperation.
|
|
9. What were the main obstacles encountered and how were they overcome?
|
The idea of development of the System was found by the Directorate of General Insurance but the implementation of the IT based work was done by IT Department. Hence it was difficult for the Directorate of General Insurance personnel to convey their will to the IT personnel who were devoid of the necessary insurance knowledge. And similarly, IT personnel had trouble in explaining IT based dilemmas to the Directorate of General Insurance personnel who did not have the background related to IT knowledge. However, owing to a series of meetings and cooperation the problem was overcomed.
|