4. In which ways is the initiative creative and innovative?
|
This strategy has been implemented by focusing on three specific areas. This focus broadly follows a chronological pattern:
The First Area: Legislation
1. It was necessary to amend and develop legislation, laws, regulations and procedures in the Ministry in order that strategic objectives could be achieved.
2. Specifically, procedural gaps in the legislations, laws, regulations and procedures had to be filled so that the rights of employees could be ensured, which had the additional effect of motivating them and increasing their productivity.
3. Procedures were simplified to the greatest extent possible in order that they could be directed towards providing the best services by the Ministry to the beneficiaries.
4. It was ensured that all processes and procedures implemented by the Ministry, particularly administrative and organizational aspects, are governed by clear and flexible instructions and systems.
5. The maximum benefits possible were taken from successful international experiences in the field of organized legislation.
The Second Area: Human Resources Management
Human resources management in the ‘Jadarah’ system was based on the following considerations:
1. An understanding of and an emphasis on the person as an individual so that employees and prospective employees can be developed by considering that a person is the foundation of growth and development, as he or she will be designing, manufacturing, arranging, and making decisions that achieve goals and will be therefore be the key determinant of success of failure..
2. Attracting the appropriate expertise and involving this asset in strategic projects, including the development of recruitment procedures.
3. Taking advantage of appropriate expertise from outside the Ministry.
The Third Area: Operational Aspects of the Project
The executive policy of the project was drawn in accordance with a detailed plan of consistent objectives and stages which can be summarized as follows:
1. Develop and make adjustments to the organizational structure of the Ministry so that strategic objectives can be achieved.
2. Structure the project team work, to ensure that implementation is timely and accuracy.
3. Divide the project into small working sections in order that it can be followed up on and carefully managed..
4. Develop standards to clearly govern and lead the project so as to measure the progress of the project in a timely manner and modify any defects in it.
5. Adjust the output through accurate quality procedures to ensure that there is product compatibility with the job requirements and that the efficiency of the product is maintained.
|
|
5. Who implemented the initiative and what is the size of the population affected by this initiative?
|
This initiative had a wide range of stakeholders that included civil servants of the MCS and job applicants (who were consulted through meetings and surveys). However, a number of key groups can be focused upon in more detail. One is the consultants who conducted meetings with officials and specialists in this area. The results of these activities was part of a preparatory study into employment systems which also included key officials from a number of branches of the MCS and other interested parties, for example from the Ministry of Education, from the King Abdullah Project for the Development of Education, SABIC and the Board of Medical Specialties. It is pertinent to emphasise the role of identified groups of citizens, Ministry staff and job applicants within this process.
Apart from the Project Team which planned and implemented the system that evolved from these extensive consultations, studies and enquiries were undertaken to gain a detailed understanding of what are seen as being the best international processes in the field of human resource management and the recruitment process, for example the US Bureau of Human Resources Management POM, the experiences of the Sultanate of Oman, the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, Malaysia, Singapore, Sweden and Australia, as well as a visit which was undertaken by the team to Japan.
|
6. How was the strategy implemented and what resources were mobilized?
|
The meaning that the name ‘Jadarah’ aims to convey is one where the initiative is comprised of a group of factors and resources that are supportive of each other and which come together to ensure the perfect implementation of the held vision. To fulfil this vision, the Ministry of Civil Service has used the latest technologies to develop its recruitment system.
However, the resources used went beyond the technological as this factor had to be enabled by others. In terms of finances, the initiative was funded from the existing budget of the MCS, which included the fees of the Project Team. It also funded the technology but this had to be considerably supported by human resources from the Ministry, particularly during the implementation phase when staff were also undergoing training that was undertaken by the use of internal training personnel.
It was also necessary to involve the human and technical resources of other ministries and government agencies, which included the training of their staff and ensuring that the system was functioning (as it was implemented) from their perspectives.
|
|
7. Who were the stakeholders involved in the design of the initiative and in its implementation?
|
Five of the most successful outputs for what is a comprehensive and integrated electronic recruitment system that contains many of the regulations governing the conduct of the recruitment process in the Kingdom are listed below:
1. The development of an electronic system linking government agencies with the Ministry of Civil Service and applicants for jobs through the registration of government agency employment needs and the studying of requirements that are approved by the Ministry of Civil Service as being compliant with the laws and regulations of the Ministry and of the country.
2. Ensuring the highest degree of accuracy and comprehensiveness of data so opportunities are provided for those wishing to apply for vacancies according to their academic qualifications, skills and experience in a timely, easy and accessible manner and in conformity with the regulations and laws of the Ministry.
3. The automation of all the selection and nomination processes of the applicants that ensures the expeditious completion of the recruitment process, the accuracy of the results of the nomination, and justice in the nominations for the jobs posted.
4. The development, furthermore, of an integrated mechanism which validates the results before announcing them electronically, thereby making sure that the highest degrees of transparency and justice are maintained.
5. The offering of an extended service which has the capacity to include all areas of public sector employment within specific areas so that candidates can easily identify the area(s) in which their applications are most likely to be successful.
|
|
8. What were the most successful outputs and why was the initiative effective?
|
The monitoring and evaluation of the initiative has not only been conducted at several levels but has also been an ongoing process since before it was implemented. This is because the initiative itself was part of a consultative process with users which included the encouraging of electronic feedback through a number of channels, including email and via the Ministry website as well as other such means, including via technical support and the National Contact Centre. These means of monitoring and evaluation continue to be encouraged and significant amounts of feedback continues to be received.
The Ministry has also developed a system for the collecting and collating of intelligence reports and statistics, which is part of a permanent review process that also includes evaluations of how the system is functioning with regard to the numbers of applicants for jobs generally and for each job specifically, and the number of vacancies in relation to the number of applicants, all of which are submitted to internal and external authorities and individuals to contribute to the ongoing decision-making processes.
The staff responsible for overseeing the recruitment process are periodically measured in terms of performance and productivity by the use of key performance indicators as measures of the continuing development of the system.
|
|
9. What were the main obstacles encountered and how were they overcome?
|
In a general sense, the main obstacle encountered was the size of the task and the fact that the extent of change meant that there were inherent dangers that this factor would overwhelm the initiative due to the increased workloads and challenges that this entailed. The solution to this was within the system because the result of it, once it was successfully running, meant that these workloads would decrease dramatically and the Ministry and other stakeholders would reap the benefits of the new system.
The fact that the recruitment of government employees was centralised around one entity and involved beneficiaries from different educational, geographical and even socio-economic levels meant that the new system had to account for many needs and these had to be accommodated. Associated with this challenge was the inclusion of international experiences and standards and these had to be adapted to the laws and regulations of the Kingdom.
This problem was overcome by informing staff across the range of agencies involved of the size of the task facing them in terms of workloads, system design and training. Motivational techniques were employed to gain an acceptance that the future value and benefits of the system were worth the investments of time for a limited period. Alongside this formal and informal (hands-on) training was comprehensively instigated, with employees sometimes being involved in training for the new system while others covered normal workloads on a rotating basis and specialist were involved in the actual implementation of the initiative.
A further example of the problem with the unwieldy nature of the system was in the many different categories of subject areas and their categorisation by educational institutions. This was overcome by re-categorising them into broader headings for similar disciplines, which also contributed towards the fairness and equity of the new system.
|