4. In which ways is the initiative creative and innovative?
|
- Exemplary process of dealing with asylum policy – proactive approach to explosive social issues
- „Civic Councils – a democratic innovation - have the potential to complement and to enrich the representative democracy in a useful way” (quote Prof. Dr. Patrizia Nanz, European Institute for Public Participation)
- Contribution to a new political culture of cooperation (politics, administration, population), through counteracting polarization and focusing on solution-oriented approaches and encounters
- Opportunity for citizens to participate actively in socio-political issues beyond political parties
- Due to participants deliberately selected at random, the Civic Council does not act as the voice of particular interest groups, but as the voice of the broad (otherwise silent) multifaceted public
- Climate of confidence due to an appropriate presentation process: plurality of opinions is experienced as a source of great enrichment and offers an unequaled opportunity for communication
- Readiness of politics and the administration to engage in open and unbiased processes
- Values that we want to experience require processes that make these values experienceable (quotation from the process observer and journalist Marietta Schürholz)
|
|
5. Who implemented the initiative and what is the size of the population affected by this initiative?
|
Roles:
- Originator: Vorarlberg State Government
- Process responsibility and coordination: Office for Future Related Issues
- Content project group: stakeholders, responsible persons from administration, representatives of industry
- Hosting Team: process facilitators & observers (documentation, magazine)
- Population affected: about 380,000 persons living in the state of Vorarlberg
Specialised organisations and stakeholders (Office of the State Governor, the departments of domestic affairs and security as well as of society and social matters of the state, the Vorarlberg Association of Municipal Corporations, the NGO Caritas, the Agency for Integration “Okay Zusammenleben” and further initiatives) were involved in the project right from the beginning. 640 persons selected at random from the residents’ register were invited to participate in the Civic Council (selection criteria: main place of residence in Vorarlberg, half of them male, half of them female, a third each from the age groups 15-35 years, 36-55 years and 56-75 years), 23 persons engaged for the process, 100 persons excused themselves. Composition of the group of 23 participants: aged between 18 and 75 years; 12 men / 11 women, 5 persons with migrant background. In two public Civic Cafés with about 150 participants and in the presence of the politically competent representatives (State Governor and State Councillors) the Civic Council presented the results and had them discussed in public. The magazine „Momentaufnahme – Ein Dialog zwischen Bevölkerung und Politik zum Asyl- und Flüchtlingswesen in Vorarlberg“ (Snapshot – A dialogue between the people and politics regarding asylum and refugee issues in Vorarlberg) with a circulation of 3,000 copies was sent to political decision-makers, state and municipal authorities, stakeholder organisations as well as to interested citizens.
|
6. How was the strategy implemented and what resources were mobilized?
|
Feb-Mar 2015 // Development and localization of the opening questions; pointing out of the utilisation values: in a first stage, the relevant stakeholders and the originator (State Government) elaborated the initial questions, narrowed down the range of topics, pointed out the scope for action for the participation process and determined in which form the results should be submitted to further processing.
Mar-Apr 2015 // Composition of the associated organisation and reflection teams: The Office for Future Related Issues assumes responsibility for the process, however not for the content aspects of the topic. Consequently, the integration of stakeholders is an essential success criteria for the development of the questions and particularly for the interpretation and utilization of the results (Office of the State Governor, State Department IVa – society, social affairs and integration as well as Department Ia – domestic affairs & security; Caritas, association Vindex, the Agency for Integration okay_zusammenleben).
12 and 13 June 2015 // Civic Council: 23 persons participated in the process that lasted for one and a half day. The initial question was: How can we successfully deal with the development of asylum and refugee matters? What may we aspect from asylum seekers? Due to the large number of participants (normally a Civic Council is composed of 12-16 persons) the group was subdivided in 2 subgroups. The results were brought together at the end of the second day in a joint presentation. Many of the elaborated contents were the same for both subgroups which indicates that there is a broad concordance within the population.
June 2015 // Public presentation of the results: The participants in the Civic Council presented their results on 15th of July in the so-called Civic Café held in two different regions of the country in order to reach as many people as possible. The first presentation took place in the FH Dornbirn (University of Applied Sciences) in Dornbirn and on the 22nd of June 2015 in the Bezeggsall in Bezau, the results were presented to the political decision-makers (State Governor Markus Wallner and State Councillor Erich Schwärzler as well as to mayors from cities and communities), to media representatives and to the population (about 150 persons). Interested persons who had come to the Civic Café were also informed about the most recent figures and political strategies and were granted the chance to contribute their opinion and their proposed solutions (World Café format).
9 July 2015 // Meeting of the Response Group: The enlarged steering group examines the results as to their utilisation value (participants in the Civic Council, Vorarlberg Association of Municipal Corporations, Chamber of Commerce, Office of the State Governor, Departments for domestic affairs & security, as well as for society and social matters, okay-zusammenleben, Caritas, Catholic Church, ZuB)
21 July 2015: State Government approves of the report elaborated by the Civic Council, deals with the results and transmits the report to the Parliament, the municipal corporations and the relevant departments; the Civic Council’s report comprises the results of three events as well as of the Response Group. The report is available to the interested public on the website of the Office for Future Related Issues. In autumn 2015, the State Government presented an extensive feedback on measures taken and/or to be taken on the basis of these presentations.
September 2015//Communication and implementation: The results of the Civic Council were extensively presented to an interested public in the magazine „Momentaufnahme – Ein Dialog zwischen Bevölkerung und Politik zum Asyl- und Flüchtlingswesen in Vorarlberg“ (Snapshot – A dialogue between the people and politics regarding asylum and refugee issues in Vorarlberg) and the results were complemented by perspectives and points of view (asylum seekers in schools, municipal corporations, industry, individual organisations, historical). A snapshot of the dialogue between the population and politics regarding asylum and refugees in Vorarlberg is thus generated. Moreover, the magazine satisfies already some major claims of the Civic Council: providing information on the current situation (figures, data, facts), a generally positive coverage and highlighting of possibilities of playing an active part in the process. A further proposal by the Civic Council will be implemented on 25th September 2015: during a coordination and networking event „Commitment by and for refugees“ within the scope of the „Long Day of Flight“ organised by the cooperation partners State Vorarlberg, Association of Municipal Corporations, Okay-Zusammenleben and Caritas Vorarlberg, a summary of the existing offers, good practice examples and the most recent challenges was presented.
Cost overview
1. Preparation, organisation and implementation of the Civic Council process: includes costs such as presentation, room hire, accompanying publicity work, etc.: approx. EUR 15,000.--
2. Coordination of the stakeholders during the implementation of the measures: process management, documentation, elaboration of concepts, networking: approx. EUR 10,000.—
3. Communication and publicity work: series of magazines „Momentaufnahme zum Asyl- und Flüchtlingswesen in Vorarlberg“; approx. 25 information events, website, etc.:
approx. EUR 25,000.--
Time requirement: Office for Future Related Issues: approx. 600h, involved state departments and system partners approx. 200h each; in total: more than 1000h of all involved stakeholders during a period of 2 years.
|
|
7. Who were the stakeholders involved in the design of the initiative and in its implementation?
|
Cooperation partners: Office of the State Governor, State Departments for domestic affairs & security, society and social matters of the State of Vorarlberg, Vorarlberg Association of Municipal Corporations, Chamber of Commerce Vorarlberg, agency for integration okay-zusammenleben, Caritas Agency for Refugee Support, Catholic Church, external process facilitators, free journalists.
|
|
8. What were the most successful outputs and why was the initiative effective?
|
The Civic Council process has effects on several levels: on the one hand, on the level of contents regarding the optimisation of the design of policies, on the other hand, on the level of political culture and thirdly on the level of the participants who learn about politics in the course of the Civic Council. Consequently, the Civic Council process contributes essentially to the SDGs “10 Reduced Inequalities“, “11 Sustainable Cities and Communities“ and “17 Partnerships for the Goals“.
The Civic Council process assists in thematising and compensating inequalities through proposal of measures (teaching of German, etc.). Political challenges can thus be communitised and the awareness that all people can contribute their part in solutions is enhanced. The process succeeded to establish the required partnerships in order to promote valuable solutions.
What is now required from both parts (receiving and arriving part) in order to have a way with the current development? This was the initial question to which the 23 persons originating from the most various social environments who participated in the Civic Council elaborated the following common core statement:
- This topic affects all of us! We can handle it!
A peaceful coexistence in our common environment requires open-mindedness and a positive attitude that can be generated through transparency, communication and that can be based on encouraging good examples from history.
The following essential recommendations resulted from this:
- Information: well-prepared overall information will be the basis; pictures distributed by media often promote unfounded fear; it should be aimed to have clarity who is here for what reasons and how the asylum seekers are housed.
- Role of the state/regions/municipal corporations: Administration plays a major part in communication and enhancement of commitment for and of refugees; co-operations with Caritas and other initiatives are a deciding factor.
- Structuring of coexistence and integration: Once housing of the asylum seekers has been successfully accomplished, the further integration process must be structured. In the course of the Civic Council process different ideas and approaches have been developed: early German courses, 150 German survival words, peer-to-peer-learning; integration of the VHS network (community college).
Beside a very positive discussion culture, the motivating appeal of the civic council „We can handle that!“) and proposed realistic actions, the participation process also led to a better interdepartmental coordination among the stakeholders regarding this explosive issue.
|
|
9. What were the main obstacles encountered and how were they overcome?
|
Coordination of the stakeholders who are actively involved in this area of issues constituted one of the major challenges, as well as the good assistance through the municipal corporations and those involved in voluntary activity. Due to the impetus by the Civic Council, appropriate coordination mechanisms were developed on all relevant levels (see also D 10).
|