Basic Info

Please review before submit

Nominee Information

Institutional Information

Member State Republic of Korea
Institution Name Seoul Metropolitan Government
Institution Type Public Agency
Administrative Level Local
Name of initiative Reaching Out Community Service Center
Projects Operational Years 3
Website of Institution http://english.seoul.go.kr/?SSid=10101&trcode=foreign

Question 1: About the Initiative

Is this a public sector initiative? Yes

Question 2: Categories

Is the initiative relevant to one of the UNPSA categories? Delivering inclusive and equitable services to leave no one behind
UNPSACriteria
2018.1.1 Introduces an innovative idea, policy, practice or structure
2018.1.2 Enhances efficiency and increase effectiveness
2018.1.3 Provides access and equity to quality services
2018.1.5 Ensures transparency in public service delivery
2018.1.6 Ensures accountability in the delivery of public services

Question 3: Sustainable Development Goals

Is the initiative relevant to any of the 17 SDG(s)? Yes
If you answered yes above, please specify which SDG is the most relevant to the initiative. (hold Ctrl to select multiple)
Goal 1: No Poverty
Which target(s) within the SDGs specified above is the initiative relevant to? (hold Ctrl to select multiple)
1.3 Implement nationally appropriate social protection systems and measures for all, including floors, and by 2030 achieve substantial coverage of the poor and the vulnerable
1.4 By 2030, ensure that all men and women, in particular the poor and the vulnerable, have equal rights to economic resources, as well as access to basic services, ownership and control over land and other forms of property, inheritance, natural resources, appropriate new technology and financial services, including microfinance

Question 4: Implementation Date

Has the initiative been implemented for two or more years Yes
Please provide date of implemenation (dd/MM/yyyy) 01 Jul 2015

Question 5: Partners

Has the United Nations or any UN agencies been involved in this initiative? No
Which UN agency was involved? (hold Ctrl to select multiple)
The Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization
Please provide details

Question 6: Supporting documentation

Will you be able to provide supporting documentation for your initiative? Yes

Question 7: UNPSA Awards

Has the initiative already won a UNPS Award? No

Question 8: Other Awards

Has the initiative won other Public Service Awards? No

Question 9: How did you learn about UNPSA?

How did you learn about UNPSA? Through the notice on the UN website and newsletter

Question 10: Validation Consent

I give consent to contact relevant persons and entities to inquire about the initiative for validation purpose. No

Question 1: About the Initiative

Is this a public sector initiative? Yes

Question 2: Categories

Is the initiative relevant to one of the UNPSA categories? Delivering inclusive and equitable services to leave no one behind
UNPSACriteria
2018.1.1 Introduces an innovative idea, policy, practice or structure
2018.1.2 Enhances efficiency and increase effectiveness
2018.1.3 Provides access and equity to quality services
2018.1.5 Ensures transparency in public service delivery
2018.1.6 Ensures accountability in the delivery of public services

Question 3: Sustainable Development Goals

Is the initiative relevant to any of the 17 SDG(s)? Yes
If you answered yes above, please specify which SDG is the most relevant to the initiative. (hold Ctrl to select multiple)
Goal 1: No Poverty
Which target(s) within the SDGs specified above is the initiative relevant to? (hold Ctrl to select multiple)
1.3 Implement nationally appropriate social protection systems and measures for all, including floors, and by 2030 achieve substantial coverage of the poor and the vulnerable
1.4 By 2030, ensure that all men and women, in particular the poor and the vulnerable, have equal rights to economic resources, as well as access to basic services, ownership and control over land and other forms of property, inheritance, natural resources, appropriate new technology and financial services, including microfinance

Question 4: Implementation Date

Has the initiative been implemented for two or more years Yes
Please provide date of implemenation (dd/MM/yyyy) 01 Jul 2015

Question 5: Partners

Has the United Nations or any UN agencies been involved in this initiative? No
Which UN agency was involved? (hold Ctrl to select multiple)
The Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization
Please provide details

Question 6: Supporting documentation

Will you be able to provide supporting documentation for your initiative? Yes

Question 7: UNPSA Awards

Has the initiative already won a UNPS Award? No

Question 8: Other Awards

Has the initiative won other Public Service Awards? No

Question 9: How did you learn about UNPSA?

How did you learn about UNPSA? Through the notice on the UN website and newsletter

Question 10: Validation Consent

I give consent to contact relevant persons and entities to inquire about the initiative for validation purpose. No

Question 1: About the Initiative

Is this a public sector initiative? Yes

Question 2: Categories

Is the initiative relevant to one of the UNPSA categories? Delivering inclusive and equitable services to leave no one behind
UNPSACriteria
2018.1.1 Introduces an innovative idea, policy, practice or structure
2018.1.2 Enhances efficiency and increase effectiveness
2018.1.3 Provides access and equity to quality services
2018.1.5 Ensures transparency in public service delivery
2018.1.6 Ensures accountability in the delivery of public services

Question 3: Implementation Date

Has the initiative been implemented for two or more years Yes
Please provide date of implemenation (dd/MM/yyyy) 01 Jul 2015

Question 4: Partners/Stakeholders

Has the United Nations or any UN agencies been involved in this initiative? No
Which UN agency was involved? (hold Ctrl to select multiple)
The Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization
Please provide details

Question 5: Required Supplemental Documents

Will you be able to provide supporting documentation for your initiative? Yes

Question 6: UNPSA Awards

Has the initiative already won a UNPS Award? No

Question 7: Other Awards

Has the initiative won other Public Service Awards? No

Question 8: Sustainable Development Goals

Is the initiative relevant to any of the 17 SDG(s)? Yes
If you answered yes above, please specify which SDG is the most relevant to the initiative. (hold Ctrl to select multiple)
Goal 1: No Poverty
Which target(s) within the SDGs specified above is the initiative relevant to? (hold Ctrl to select multiple)
1.3 Implement nationally appropriate social protection systems and measures for all, including floors, and by 2030 achieve substantial coverage of the poor and the vulnerable
1.4 By 2030, ensure that all men and women, in particular the poor and the vulnerable, have equal rights to economic resources, as well as access to basic services, ownership and control over land and other forms of property, inheritance, natural resources, appropriate new technology and financial services, including microfinance

Question 9: Validation Consent

Do you have any objections to us inquiring about the initiative for validation purposes? No

How did you know about UNPSA?

How did you know about UNPSA? Through the notice on the UN website and newsletter

Nomination form

Questions/Answers

Question 1

Please describe the objective of the initiative introduced (200 words maximum)
Based on the vision of establishing “a welfare community made by the people, and a community service center that serves the people,” this initiative aims to strengthen the social safety net in local communities and realize the autonomy of citizens. Reaching Out Community Service Center does this by changing the paradigm for providing welfare service to citizens. The formation of a social safety net in local communities refers to the implementation of policies that have deep, positive impacts on the lives of the people. By strengthening the social safety net in communities, we hope to expand the provision of public services, including welfare and healthcare, to more people. In addition, we hope to realize the autonomy of citizens by establishing networks at the neighborhood level and create a welfare ecosystem in local communities by implementing true public-private governance.

Question 2

Please explain how the initiative is linked to the category and criteria selected (100 words maximum)
This project establishes a resident-centered system for identifying those in need of assistance and creates a community where citizens resolve problems in their communities. It intends to deliver an inclusive and equitable service to all. This project utilizes “Our Neighborhood Action Officers,” who provide administrative services for citizens. In pursuing these goals, we have strengthened public responsibility and provided customized services for the most vulnerable citizens. We have also strengthened the social safety net by encouraging the participation of various local community actors. The tasks of this initiative largely involve providing support for vulnerable citizens through integrated services.

Question 3

Please describe in what ways the initiative is contributing to the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the realization of the SDGs. Specify which SDG(s) it is relevant to. (100 words maximum)
This program attempts to achieve SDG 10. The SMG increased the number of social welfare workers and nurses in each neighborhood by an average of 6.8 people, thereby reducing the number of people for whom each worker or nurse is responsible, from 289 to 126. This helped us identify welfare blind spots and implement “reaching out welfare”. In providing this kind of welfare service, social welfare workers visit poor citizens, the elderly, households with infants, and other people who have difficulty visiting their community service center and provide customized welfare and healthcare services to each individual according to their life stage

Question 4

The initiative must have positive impact on a group or groups of the population, especially the vulnerable (i.e. children, women, older persons, people with disabilities, etc.) within the context of your country or region. Please explain how the initiative has addressed a significant shortfall in governance, public administration or public service within the context of a given country or region. (200 words maximum)
Our solution was to turn Seoul into a people-centered city where citizens are able to enjoy their lives. To achieve this, we decided to change the city’s community service centers into places that satisfy the needs of the residents of Seoul. Therefore, we established a beneficiary-centered welfare administration by dramatically increasing the number of workers at local community service centers and began providing universal welfare services customized to the life stage of the beneficiary to at-risk, low-income households, households in welfare blind spots, elderly citizens over the age of 65, and households with infants. Visiting nurses were assigned to community service centers to provide thorough healthcare services for local residents in an effort to narrow the healthcare gap and contribute to prolonging the healthy lives of citizens. In addition, various improvements were made to the community service centers, such as the creation of communal spaces for residents, enabling both the private and public sectors to cater to the needs of local residents. These efforts have established community service centers as essential spaces in local communities.

Question 5

a. Please explain in which way the initiative is innovative in the context of your country or region (100 words maximum)
This initiative is innovative since it transformed the function of community service centers from places where civil complaints are processed to communal spaces focusing on the people and their welfare, establishing a foundation for the provision of universal rather than selective welfare. We made structural changes to personnel and teams, redesigned the physical spaces of the community service centers with a greater emphasis on residents, fostered organizations made up of residents in order to educate them on how to solve the problems in their communities, and developed resources for communities in cooperation with local residents.
b. Please describe if the innovation is original or if it is an adaptation from other contexts (100 words maximum)
The Reaching Out Community Center Initiative was first undertaken by Seoul to improve the existing welfare policy by shifting its focus towards citizens and strengthening public responsibility. We focused on transforming from a resident request-based system to a government identification-based system. In this way, we could realize “reaching out welfare,” provide comprehensive services that meet the needs of citizens, identify and discover citizen leaders, use local community service centers as a platform for discussing the issues of local communities, and provide continuous care services to residents. Through this, Seoul has improved and reorganized its unique welfare delivery system.

Question 6

Has the initiative been transferred and adapted to in other contexts (e.g. other cities, countries or regions) to your organization’s knowledge? If yes, please explain (100 words maximum)
The Reaching Out Community Service Center Initiative’s welfare and healthcare service has been praised nationwide for its innovation, effectiveness, and accomplishments. In July 2017, it was included among the “100 Best Government Projects of the Republic of Korea.” Currently, the service is being applied across Korea. With many local governments having already completed trial runs, the service is now being applied to their welfare systems. In 2016, at the request of Beijing, we participated in a design workshop to share our experiences with the “space improvement” project of the Reaching Out Community Service Center Initiative.

Question 7

a. What resources (i.e. financial, human or others) were used to implement the initiative? (100 words maximum)
In order to be sustainable, it must first earn the trust of the people. We were able to build trust as our officials identified and resolved issues affecting the welfare and healthcare of local residents. As a result, the level of public-private trust increased by 24.5 percent, and citizens were highly satisfied with the friendliness, expertise, communication skills, and efficiency of the community service center officials. Furthermore, this initiative has created a system through which people can search for resources that can be shared at the local community level, which has made this initiative to be assessed sustainable.
b. Please describe whether and how the initiative is sustainable (covering the social, economic and environmental aspects) (200 words maximum)
Instead of making a small, temporary change to the support system for at-risk, low-income families and other vulnerable groups, this innovative initiative made a fundamental, long-term change to the welfare delivery system. Now, the Reaching Out Community Service Center Initiative is well established. To ensure the sustainability of the initiative, the Seoul Metropolitan Government has created a sustainable training program for government officials consisting of electives that cater to individuals’ needs and capabilities, in addition to the core curricula. Moreover, the Welfare Information System has been improved to provide integrated information on the welfare and healthcare services offered to citizens. In this way, the manpower and material basis necessary for the sustainability of the initiative have been fully established.

Question 8

a. Has the initiative been formally evaluated either through internal or external evaluation?
Yes
We submit reports on the process and accomplishments of this initiative to the Korea Administration Public-Relations Festa (KAPFESTA), Korea Local Autonomy Exposition, and other policy evaluation events so that the initiative can be assessed and evaluated. In addition, the Seoul Institute conducts performance assessments to evaluate the level of citizen satisfaction with the initiative, public-private trust, extent of citizens’ autonomy, and welfare recipients’ satisfaction with the services they received
b. Please describe the indicators that were used (100 words maximum)
Seoul Institute conducted an assessment of the initiative by examining how many times social welfare workers paid visits to citizens, in how many cases welfare was provided, and how satisfied people were with the service, among other factors. The Seoul Institute conducted a quantitative evaluation (i.e. measured quantitative performance) and qualitative evaluation (i.e. gauged the level of qualitative effort assessed by the recipients and people involved, improvement in recipient’s level of satisfaction, etc.). The assessment results included a proposal regarding the mid- to long-term direction that the development of the initiative should take in the future.
c. Please describe the outcome of the evaluation (100 words maximum)
After the evaluations conducted at KAPFESTA in August 2017, the Reaching Out Community Service Center Initiative was honored with the presidential award, which is granted only to initiatives undertaken by a local government in Korea. The initiative was also introduced as one of Seoul’s major initiatives at the Korea Local Autonomy Exposition held in November 2017. Certain aspects of the new national welfare system, announced with the “100 Best Government Projects of the Republic of Korea” in July 2017, were based on the innovative Reaching Out Community Service Center, particularly the initiative’s basic elements.

Question 9

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development puts emphasis on collaboration, engagement, coordination, partnerships, and inclusion. Please describe what and how stakeholders were engaged in designing, implementing and evaluating the initiative. Please also highlight their roles and contributions (200 words maximum)
From its conceptualization to implementation, the Reaching Out Community Service Center project has been operated through public-private governance. The governance of the initiative involves: the Reaching Out Community Service Center Steering Committee, headed by the First Vice-Mayor for Administrative Affairs of the Seoul Metropolitan Government and consisting of government officials from each department, professors in the areas of welfare, healthcare, and community, experts from various social sectors, and the Community Service Center Promotion and Support Group, made up of social welfare organizations, community activity organizations, social economic organizations, and ordinary citizens. Experts from various sectors design the content of the initiative, while government officials implement and execute it. The Promotion and Support Group makes efforts to ensure the progress and implementation of the initiative, while assessment organizations constantly monitor the initiative’s results. In addition, we established a joint public-private taskforce to re-establish the role of private welfare organizations. The complementary roles of both private and public organizations were established through the vitalization of public-private, working-level training clubs. Moreover, in the process of expanding the scope of the initiative in each stage, we designed and promoted the initiative based on the results of discussions with the districts and residents.

Question 10

Please describe the key lessons learned, and any view you have on how to further improve the initiative (100 words maximum)
We learned innovation of the public welfare system is possible only after acknowledging the people’s right to welfare, the diversity of people’s needs, and the national government’s responsibility to provide welfare. We learned we needed to design the initiative through the continuous research and investigation of experts in the private and public sectors and through the investment of materials, personnel, and funds. Seoul has made local communities safer and healthier, improved citizens’ quality of life, and encouraged citizens to effectively release their social, economic, and cultural needs. We have transformed Seoul into a city working with citizens actively to make their dreams a reality.

Return to list

Please wait...