Questions/Answers
Question 1
Please briefly describe the initiative, what issue or challenge it aims to address and specify its objectives. (300 words maximum)
Development of Public and Institutional Policies to Support Labour Inclusion, Access to Justice, with processes and procedures for counselling, awareness raising and supervision in cases of Persons with Disabilities (PcD)
It involves a Professional Team that intervenes and media in the development, design and implementation of activities and proposals that enientiate and attend to Diversity.
Labour Inclusion, Training of Peers References (in areas of Violence, Gender and Family), Sign Language Interpretation, Training of Peace Judges for PcD Actions, Awareness in the Field of Adoption of Children with Disabilities, Accessibility Information.
All in conjunction with Gender and Ethnic Policies (Interculturality).
Training in the care of Users with Disabilities
Question 2
Please explain how the initiative is linked to the selected category. (100 words maximum)
It guarantees inclusive processes that address problems typical of gender gaze, interculturality, and functional diversity (disability).
Access to Justice, Principles of Equity, and Combats Discrimination.
It installs Public Policies on the subject and obliges the development of compliance regulatory frameworks guaranteeing Rights.
Question 3
a. Please specify which SDGs and target(s) the initiative supports and describe concretely how the initiative has contributed to their implementation. (200 words maximum)
Equality, Inclusion, Non-Discrimination, Rights (Human and Labour)
Development of an innovative Public Policy, which begins to be replicated as a model of action.
It has allowed the employment inclusion of Persons with Disabilities, new Regulatory Frameworks, training and training spaces; inspired by its replication by other institutions and bodies (public and private).
It has reduced social conflict on the subject, and has transparent job access contests.
The work has been recognized by groups related to the Inclusion theme, and by the Chamber of Deputies of the Nation.
b. Please describe what makes the initiative sustainable in social, economic and environmental terms. (100 words maximum)
It became an Institutional and Public Policy.
Regulatory frameworks were developed to gantatize its application, rights, protocols, etc.
It does not involve differential budgeting.
It is supported by groups and social groups.
Public knowledge results have already been recorded.
By institutionalizing and stipulating as a line of action it transcends subjects and wills of turn.
It is replicable (and there are theoretical, procedural, methodological and results-for-dissemination foundations and regulations).
Training and awareness-raising spaces to foster natural supports (assessment of model and experiences)
Question 4
a. Please explain how the initiative has addressed a significant shortfall in governance, public administration or public service within the context of a given country or region. (200 words maximum)
It is the first proposal of the planned design, with external advice, and formation of support and monitoring equipment in public institutions of the country.
It provides assertive compliance with legal regulatory frameworks, and addresses claims and mobilizations of groups and collectives for the Right to Labour Inclusion, Access to Justice (in Disability), in training officials on Interculturality (in a communion of migrants, intercultural and bilingual/Indigenous Peoples), taking together the attention of gender, cultural (ethnics/Mapuches) and disability.
Awareness-raising and training for the non-segregation, exclusion and discrimination of minority groups and so far excluded.
b. Please describe how your initiative addresses gender inequality in the country context. (100 words maximum)
Training, Awareness-Raising and Specific Training in Joint Gender, Interculturality and Disability issues, both for labour inclusion and for the legal operator, a done with science and awareness that their resolutions and risks; training for executing agents (the police), and access to information.
c. Please describe who the target group(s) were, and explain how the initiative improved outcomes for these target groups. (200 words maximum)
Persons with Disabilities (Labour Inclusion): opportunity for quality employment, public policies in favor of access to labour rights, and the creation of national frameworks that comply with the Laws that guarantee their opportunities (90 cases)
Persons with Disabilities (user): training to the legal operator in forms of care, notification, safety and hygiene, evacuation protocols, interpretation in Sign Language, creation of referents peers
Indigenous Peoples: training and training of legal operators
Gender: sensitization, armed with attention protocols, creation of even references.
Question 5
a. Please describe how the initiative was implemented including key developments and steps, monitoring and evaluation activities, and the chronology. (300 words)
Proposal Regulatory Approval
Contest Design
Individual and Collective Training, Training and Awareness-Raising Instance
Pre and post inclusion advice
Arming Specific Equipment and External Advisors
Designs and Implementation of Protocols (Inclusion and Care)
Reasonable adequacies or adjustments, case review
Follow-up interviews.
Cross-sectional monitoring (internal and external)
Accompaniment to specific cases (on request)
Dissemination and systematization of proposals, results, etc.
Practices/Simulations/Workshops
b. Please clearly explain the obstacles encountered and how they were overcome. (100 words)
Prejudice (Awareness Workshops)
Architectural Barriers (Ergonomic Accessibility Protocols)
Linguistics (Sign Language Courses, Augmentive Alternative Communication, Intérpetre Figure and Translator)
Question 6
a. Please explain in what ways the initiative is innovative in the context of your country or region. (100 words maximum)
First adapted and assertive application experience of the theoretical model of Employment with Support in configuring as An Insitucional and Public Policy, combining in the working structure three axes: Gender. Interculturality and Disability, extending Access to Justice to the official and User of the System.
It is the first model he takes as advisors and concerning people with Disabilities.
b. Please describe, if relevant, how the initiative drew inspiration from successful initiative in other regions, countries and localities. (100 words maximum)
He only took the Theoretical Model of Employment with Support (Spain) and adapted individual job inclusion experiences, designing a mechanism of his own (appropriate to the regulations and characteristics of the Judiciary), and drawings that combined the frameworks the paradigm of diversity, and institutional will.
We do not know other regional experiences that work on inclusion as public policy at the scale (we talk about 90 cases) and that generates simultaneous policies of Gender and Interculturality.
Question 7
a. Has the initiative been transferred and/or adapted to other contexts (e.g. other cities, countries or regions) to your organization’s knowledge? If yes, please explain where and how. (200 words maximum)
The "Faro Patagonia" Foundation (Rio Negro, Argentina), the Civil Association "Lazos Azules" (Neuquén), the Discar Foundation (Labor Inlcutucus Argentina) and the Munciipality of Andresito (Missions) have taken our model and have begun to design and implement this type of work was recently planned.
It has been highlighted by the Chamber of Deputies of Ela Nación (Argentina) to be taken as an example by and for state agencies, and has been disseminated in International Congresses as quality experience
b. If not yet transferred/adapted to other contexts, please describe the potential for transferability. (200 words maximum)
Having theoretical basis, procedural examples, systematized protocols of action, demonstrative practical results, no need for allocation of significant economic resources, and the possibility of training of references and professionals, is highly viable its replica.
Question 8
a. What specific resources (i.e. financial, human or others) were used to implement the initiative? (100 words maximum)
Human Resources: 2 External Advisors with Experience and area professionals already formed within the Judiciary (reassignment of tasks)/Possibility of accessing internal and external training spaces
Economic Resources: not significant (only the stage of advice and external evaluation) / payment of two advisers (the other expenditureps are budgeted in and from the institutional own areas)
Materials: in some specific case, acquisition of ergonomic material
b. Please explain what makes the initiative sustainable over time, in financial and institutional terms. (100 words maximum)
Doesn't need differentiated budget items
It is an experience valued institutionally and by social groups and groups related to the themes (disability, gender, interculturality)
You don't need to make up large work teams (only one 5-person reference)
There are constitutional, legal and regulatory frameworks (national, provincial and institutional) that guarantee the process as a law.
Institutional benchmarks are already being trained and trained in the process.
It is a public institution (does not give bankruptcy)
Question 9
a. Was the initiative formally evaluated either internally or externally?
Yes
b. Please describe how it was evaluated and by whom? (100 words maximum)
The DISCAR Foundation regularly conducts checks and advice, conducts ongoing interviews and follow-up visits (systematized and registered), has a permanent external advisor, and the workshops are already held surveys of assessment/evaluation of instances.
c. Please describe the indicators and tools used. (100 words maximum)
Interviews (individual and team)
Surveys (activity assessment)
Supervision (permanent in jobs)
Institutional mail (consultations, requirements, complaints, etc.)
Book of Minutes (of activities and records)
Protocols of Action
Documenting through Minutes- Protocol Agreements, Resolutions, Suggestions and Directives.
Number of cases served (list, contest, income)
d. What were the main findings of the evaluation (e.g. adequacy of resources mobilized for the initiative, quality of implementation and challenges faced, main outcomes, sustainability of the initiative, impacts) and how this information is being used to inform the initiative’s implementation. (200 words maximum)
The assessment of the experience
the breakdown of prejudices and stereotypes
the lack of significant adaptations
the high cup of contests won and exams approved post-entry
non-registration of complaints or negative suggestions in the User Complaint Books
100% of Labour Inclusion cases have been confirmed (after the probationary period)
jury trial with indians
increased application cases for specific areas (mediation, adoption, gender)
dissemination in national and local media of tasks and proposals
Question 10
Please describe how the initiative strives to work in an integrated manner within its institutional landscape – for example, how does the initiative work horizontally and/or vertically across different levels of government? (200 words maximum)
The areas/Units/offices submit the request for the need (work vacancy / attention to a user / specific training) is addressed to the requirement and the need of each area.
The team advises and participates in specific needs framework (does not impose)
Internal regulations are developed
The modes and means of intervention/mediation are coordinated in cases
Question 11
The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development puts emphasis on collaboration, engagement, partnerships, and inclusion. Please describe which stakeholders were engaged in designing, implementing and evaluating the initiative and how this engagement took place. (200 words maximum)
Social Movements, groups and groups were taken into account, and public complaints about the lack of employment opportunities (Labour Inclusion).
Local references, referring professionals, and foundations were cited and invited to screen the processes, with intervention to unions to ensure transparency and support for the inicitives.
A reference with Disability was hired to advise and supervise processes, and gender work was institutionally implemented with the Police, the Discar Foundation, the Office of Access to Justice.
Question 12
Please describe the key lessons learned, and how your organization plans to improve the initiative. (200 words maximum)
Social Movements, groups and groups were taken into account, and public complaints about the lack of employment opportunities (Labour Inclusion).
Local references, referring professionals, and foundations were cited and invited to screen the processes, with intervention to unions to ensure transparency and support for the inicitives.
A reference with Disability was hired to advise and supervise processes, and gender work was institutionally implemented with the Police, the Discar Foundation, the Office of Access to Justice.