Basic Info

Please review before submit

Nominee Information

Institutional Information

Member State Thailand
Institution Name Maesuk Sub-district Administrative Organization
Institution Type Ministry
Ministry Type Please select
Administrative Level National
Name of initiative “Geographic Information System for Area Management”. Such system is a mechanism for solving conflict
Projects Operational Years 3
Website of Institution https://www.maesuksao.go.th/

Question 1: About the Initiative

Is this a public sector initiative? Yes

Question 2: Categories

Is the initiative relevant to one of the UNPSA categories? Enhancing the effectiveness of public institutions to reach the SDGs
UNPSACriteria
NoItems

Question 3: Sustainable Development Goals

Is the initiative relevant to any of the 17 SDG(s)? Yes
If you answered yes above, please specify which SDG is the most relevant to the initiative. (hold Ctrl to select multiple)
Goal 10: Reduced Inequalities
Which target(s) within the SDGs specified above is the initiative relevant to? (hold Ctrl to select multiple)
10.3 Ensure equal opportunity and reduce inequalities of outcome, including by eliminating discriminatory laws, policies and practices and promoting appropriate legislation, policies and action in this regard

Question 4: Implementation Date

Has the initiative been implemented for two or more years Yes
Please provide date of implemenation (dd/MM/yyyy) 08 Dec 2017

Question 5: Partners

Has the United Nations or any UN agencies been involved in this initiative? No
Which UN agency was involved? (hold Ctrl to select multiple)
Please provide details

Question 6: Previous Participation

1. Has the initiative submitted an application for consideration in the past 3 years (2017-2019)? No

Question 7: UNPSA Awards

Has the initiative already won a UNPS Award? No

Question 8: Other Awards

Has the initiative won other Public Service Awards? Yes
If yes, please specify name, organisation and year. the Excellent Local Administrative Organization with Good Governance Award 2020

Question 9: How did you learn about UNPSA?

How did you learn about UNPSA? UN

Question 10: Validation Consent

I give consent to contact relevant persons and entities to inquire about the initiative for validation purpose. Yes

Question 1: About the Initiative

Is this a public sector initiative? Yes

Question 2: Categories

Is the initiative relevant to one of the UNPSA categories? Enhancing the effectiveness of public institutions to reach the SDGs
UNPSACriteria
NoItems

Question 3: Sustainable Development Goals

Is the initiative relevant to any of the 17 SDG(s)? Yes
If you answered yes above, please specify which SDG is the most relevant to the initiative. (hold Ctrl to select multiple)
Goal 10: Reduced Inequalities
Which target(s) within the SDGs specified above is the initiative relevant to? (hold Ctrl to select multiple)
10.3 Ensure equal opportunity and reduce inequalities of outcome, including by eliminating discriminatory laws, policies and practices and promoting appropriate legislation, policies and action in this regard

Question 4: Implementation Date

Has the initiative been implemented for two or more years Yes
Please provide date of implemenation (dd/MM/yyyy) 08 Dec 2017

Question 5: Partners

Has the United Nations or any UN agencies been involved in this initiative? No
Which UN agency was involved? (hold Ctrl to select multiple)
Please provide details

Question 6: Previous Participation

1. Has the initiative submitted an application for consideration in the past 3 years (2017-2019)? No

Question 7: UNPSA Awards

Has the initiative already won a UNPS Award? No

Question 8: Other Awards

Has the initiative won other Public Service Awards? Yes
If yes, please specify name, organisation and year. the Excellent Local Administrative Organization with Good Governance Award 2020

Question 9: How did you learn about UNPSA?

How did you learn about UNPSA? UN

Question 10: Validation Consent

I give consent to contact relevant persons and entities to inquire about the initiative for validation purpose. Yes

Nomination form

Questions/Answers

Question 1

Please briefly describe the initiative, what issue or challenge it aims to address and specify its objectives. (300 words maximum)
Beyond 29 November 1974, Thailand government stated and announced a restricted area of reserved forest in Mae Chaem district covering all over Mae Suk sub-district. In this area, villagers in Mae Suk occupied their land use before an announcement. Which the conflict started since that and resulting to legal enforcement. Mae Suk sub-district has solved the problem by using engagement mechanism and an advanced participating geographic information system (AP-GIS).Also provides community land use and restricted reserved forest boundary is clearly identified through a Mea Suk Portal System.

Question 2

Please explain how the initiative is linked to the selected category. (100 words maximum)
The project is consistent to number 2 category: Increasing of service performance with sustaining development. Mae Suk sub-district is responsible for solving problems of suffering improve the quality of villagers in Mea Suk through participation process. Villagers can be thinking, planning, make decisions and responsible with Mae Suk sub-district.

Question 3

a. Please specify which SDGs and target(s) the initiative supports and describe concretely how the initiative has contributed to their implementation. (200 words maximum)
Resolving of conflict between government section and people on community land use and restricted forest area. This section is corresponding to the sustainable development term number 10: Reduction of domestic and international disparity (Indicator number 1: Assure to distribute equality and opportunity together with elimination of disparity). The project eliminates legal statement, policy statement and deprivation by substitution of supporting legal correctness, policy correctness and suitable operating procedures. The outcome resulting to 3,270 families are certificated to archive of land use documents by 100 percent of affected target.
b. Please describe what makes the initiative sustainable in social, economic and environmental terms. (100 words maximum)
The project introduces an advanced participating geographic information system to resolve conflict between government section and people. resulting to an explicit data of restricted forest area. It also to reduce deforestation and create learning resources integrate information ,Technology , Knowledge and joint management for people to studying.

Question 4

a. Please explain how the initiative has addressed a significant shortfall in governance, public administration or public service within the context of a given country or region. (200 words maximum)
The project states an explicit data of restricted forest area with advanced participating geographic information system resulting to resolving the conflict between government section and community. The proposed system also prevents an intrusion of unexpected land use and resulting to reduction in people disparity by novel government public service for improve the quality of villagers in Mea Suk.
b. Please describe how your initiative addresses gender inequality in the country context. (100 words maximum)
The proposed project services to all people in public with no age or gender restriction. By historical service records 2018, the proposed system has serviced 1,090 male clients (65%) and 598 female clients (35%). In 2019, the system has serviced 2,861 male clients (71%) and 1,212 female clients (29%). At the present year 2020, the system has serviced 1,546 male clients (82%) and 346 female clients (18%)
c. Please describe who the target group(s) were, and explain how the initiative improved outcomes for these target groups. (200 words maximum)
People and government officer can search for the land use information and national restricted forest area using an effective internet service. The proposed system supports land use management with obvious data and transparency. That will be resolving the conflict between government section and community.

Question 5

a. Please describe how the initiative was implemented including key developments and steps, monitoring and evaluation activities, and the chronology. (300 words)
Land use data is surveyed by announcing the community conference resulting to conclusion in admitting by committee. All participating parties, agencies and institutions are conducted to field operation. Land topography and geographic information data shape files are created and collected. All information are approved by all parties resulting in a community digital map system.
b. Please clearly explain the obstacles encountered and how they were overcome. (100 words)
In some area are out of internet signal coverage resulting to unable of geographic information operation for a desired purposed. The solution is using satellite map technology to examine the boundary line and some re-survey all affected area with offline mode and transfer data to the online system later.

Question 6

a. Please explain in what ways the initiative is innovative in the context of your country or region. (100 words maximum)
Resolving of conflict between government section and people on community land use by advanced participating geographic information system (AP-GIS) with obvious data and transparency and engagement mechanism in Mae Suk Sub-district https://gistdaportal.gistda.or.th/portal/apps/sites/#/maesuk
b. Please describe, if relevant, how the initiative drew inspiration from successful initiatives in other regions, countries and localities. (100 words maximum)
The proposed project implemented an online advanced participating geographic information system (AP-GIS). The system serviced to government section and community resulting to an effective land use management system with impartiality an legal imparity. The proposed AP-GIS system can be devolopvement as a central seach system for information of Mea Suk Sub-district (MAESUK PORTAL).
c. If emerging and frontier technologies were used, please state how these were integrated into the initiative and/or how the initiative embraced digital government. (100 words maximum)
Advanced participating geographic information system (AP-GIS) and MAESUK PORTAL with public service is applied to digitalize geographic and demographic land use data with obvious participation survey. An application of system is resulting to resolving all conflicts between government section and people in an affected community.

Question 7

a. Has the initiative been transferred and/or adapted to other contexts (e.g. other cities, countries or regions) to your organization’s knowledge? If yes, please explain where and how. (200 words maximum)
The proposed project has been applied to agricultural production and farmer registration resulting to a valid farmer database that provides government support and welfare to famers correctly.
b. If not yet transferred/adapted to other contexts, please describe the potential for transferability. (200 words maximum)
-

Question 8

a. What specific resources (i.e. financial, human or others) were used to implement the initiative? (100 words maximum)
To resolve conflicts between government section and people in community that own their land in the restricted forest area, financial resources has been government support is 505,000 BHT. Field operation tools and materials were supported by government. All human resources were available from government and community villagers.
b. Please explain what makes the initiative sustainable over time, in financial and institutional terms. (100 words maximum)
Social: Collaborating between government section and people in community has been established resulting to Center of Area Management (CAM) – Mae Suk. CAM-Mae Suk resolves not only all conflicts between government section and people. The center also decrease disparity in government public service thoroughly. The center also established an integration help-desk service for government and people in case of financial, knowledge, technology, tools, and materials. Economic: People received their land use certificate without conflict to legal regulations and earned sustainable certain income. Environmental: The project conducts to prevent invading/intrusion to a new forest together with forest rehabilitation.

Question 9

a. Was the initiative formally evaluated either internally or externally?
Yes
b. Please describe how it was evaluated and by whom? (100 words maximum)
Evaluation and audit of the project were carried out successfully. Internal auditor were monitoring and evaluation committee. Main external auditors were from Office of the Decentralization to the Local Government Organization Committee (ODLOC). The auditory standards were stated from Office of the Permanent Secretary, the Prime Minister’s Office under Good Management Practice: Local innovation.
c. Please describe the indicators and tools used. (100 words maximum)
An indicator for internal organization impact is an achievement of establishing Center of Area Management (CAM) – Mae Suk and the number of resolved cases. Indicators for external organization impact are concordance of a proposed innovation to a conflict and concordance to regional context. These two main impacts illustrated number of participants which indicates to the collaboration network. Outputs and outcomes from the project were impacted to social and economic development together with quality of life with the proposed innovation.
d. What were the main findings of the evaluation (e.g. adequacy of resources mobilized for the initiative, quality of implementation and challenges faced, main outcomes, sustainability of the initiative, impacts) and how is this information being used to inform the initiative’s implementation? (200 words maximum)
The project outputs were classified below: Countable numeric output: Hundred percent (100%) of people without legal land use document were certificated and registered. After that, all affected people received their documents successfully. Uncountable output: The project prevents intrusion/invading of new forest area together with future forest rehabilitation. ODLOC evaluated this project to the second rank (general innovation).

Question 10

Please describe how the initiative is inscribed in the relevant institutional landscape (for example, how is it situated with respect to relevant government agencies, and how have these institutional relationships been operating). (200 words maximum)
Mae Suk Sub-district Administrative Organization (SAO) stated a policy to resolved conflicts between government section and people. The organization constructed a project with participating concept and let people involved to it. SAO also established participating mechanism with community leading. The project motivated SAO’s officer to resolve problematic conflicts with higher vision resulting to a teamwork collaboration between officer and people.

Question 11

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development puts emphasis on collaboration, engagement, partnerships, and inclusion. Please describe which stakeholders were engaged in designing, implementing and evaluating the initiative and how this engagement took place. (200 words maximum)
People established Center of Area Management (CAM) – Mae Suk. Collaboration in administrative scale of sub-district and village was carried out. Field operation volunteers and committee were recruited and enrolled. The project has been evaluated transparently. The project would like to express our graceful thanks to: - Raks Thai Foundation for their financial support. - Regional Center of Geo-Informatic and Space Technology, Northern Region for their knowledge transfer , technology and financial support. - Mae Chaem District Administrative Office for knowledge transfer. - People for cooperation that for Field operation volunteers and audit committee.

Question 12

Please describe the key lessons learned, and how your organization plans to improve the initiative. (200 words maximum)
Collaborating of community reflects the problematic resolve classification resulting to direct solution that meets to the needs. Collaboration is not only terminated conflicts between government section and people, but also decrease social imparity in term of public government service thoroughly to the community.

Return to list

Please wait...