Basic Info

Please review before submit

Nominee Information

Institutional Information

Member State Thailand
Institution Name Bureau of Elderly Health
Institution Type Public Agency
Administrative Level National
Name of initiative System Development for Long Term Care in Community through 3C’s Innovation
Projects Operational Years 3
Website of Institution http://eh.anamai.moph.go.th/main.php?filename=index

Question 1: About the Initiative

Is this a public sector initiative? Yes

Question 2: Categories

Is the initiative relevant to one of the UNPSA categories? Delivering inclusive and equitable services to leave no one behind
UNPSACriteria
2018.1.1 Introduces an innovative idea, policy, practice or structure
2018.1.2 Enhances efficiency and increase effectiveness
2018.1.3 Provides access and equity to quality services

Question 3: Sustainable Development Goals

Is the initiative relevant to any of the 17 SDG(s)? Yes
If you answered yes above, please specify which SDG is the most relevant to the initiative. (hold Ctrl to select multiple)
Goal 3: Good Health
Which target(s) within the SDGs specified above is the initiative relevant to? (hold Ctrl to select multiple)
3.8 Achieve universal health coverage, including financial risk protection, access to quality essential health-care services and access to safe, effective, quality and affordable essential medicines and vaccines for all

Question 4: Implementation Date

Has the initiative been implemented for two or more years Yes
Please provide date of implemenation (dd/MM/yyyy) 01 Oct 2016

Question 5: Partners

Has the United Nations or any UN agencies been involved in this initiative? No
Which UN agency was involved? (hold Ctrl to select multiple)
The Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization
Please provide details

Question 6: Supporting documentation

Will you be able to provide supporting documentation for your initiative? Yes

Question 7: UNPSA Awards

Has the initiative already won a UNPS Award? No

Question 8: Other Awards

Has the initiative won other Public Service Awards? No

Question 9: How did you learn about UNPSA?

How did you learn about UNPSA? Circulated letter from Office of Public Sector Development Commission, Thailand, and Department of Health's past submission

Question 10: Validation Consent

I give consent to contact relevant persons and entities to inquire about the initiative for validation purpose. No

Question 1: About the Initiative

Is this a public sector initiative? Yes

Question 2: Categories

Is the initiative relevant to one of the UNPSA categories? Delivering inclusive and equitable services to leave no one behind
UNPSACriteria
2018.1.1 Introduces an innovative idea, policy, practice or structure
2018.1.2 Enhances efficiency and increase effectiveness
2018.1.3 Provides access and equity to quality services

Question 3: Sustainable Development Goals

Is the initiative relevant to any of the 17 SDG(s)? Yes
If you answered yes above, please specify which SDG is the most relevant to the initiative. (hold Ctrl to select multiple)
Goal 3: Good Health
Which target(s) within the SDGs specified above is the initiative relevant to? (hold Ctrl to select multiple)
3.8 Achieve universal health coverage, including financial risk protection, access to quality essential health-care services and access to safe, effective, quality and affordable essential medicines and vaccines for all

Question 4: Implementation Date

Has the initiative been implemented for two or more years Yes
Please provide date of implemenation (dd/MM/yyyy) 01 Oct 2016

Question 5: Partners

Has the United Nations or any UN agencies been involved in this initiative? No
Which UN agency was involved? (hold Ctrl to select multiple)
The Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization
Please provide details

Question 6: Supporting documentation

Will you be able to provide supporting documentation for your initiative? Yes

Question 7: UNPSA Awards

Has the initiative already won a UNPS Award? No

Question 8: Other Awards

Has the initiative won other Public Service Awards? No

Question 9: How did you learn about UNPSA?

How did you learn about UNPSA? Circulated letter from Office of Public Sector Development Commission, Thailand, and Department of Health's past submission

Question 10: Validation Consent

I give consent to contact relevant persons and entities to inquire about the initiative for validation purpose. No

Question 1: About the Initiative

Is this a public sector initiative? Yes

Question 2: Categories

Is the initiative relevant to one of the UNPSA categories? Delivering inclusive and equitable services to leave no one behind
UNPSACriteria
2018.1.1 Introduces an innovative idea, policy, practice or structure
2018.1.2 Enhances efficiency and increase effectiveness
2018.1.3 Provides access and equity to quality services

Question 3: Implementation Date

Has the initiative been implemented for two or more years Yes
Please provide date of implemenation (dd/MM/yyyy) 01 Oct 2016

Question 4: Partners/Stakeholders

Has the United Nations or any UN agencies been involved in this initiative? No
Which UN agency was involved? (hold Ctrl to select multiple)
The Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization
Please provide details

Question 5: Required Supplemental Documents

Will you be able to provide supporting documentation for your initiative? Yes

Question 6: UNPSA Awards

Has the initiative already won a UNPS Award? No

Question 7: Other Awards

Has the initiative won other Public Service Awards? No

Question 8: Sustainable Development Goals

Is the initiative relevant to any of the 17 SDG(s)? Yes
If you answered yes above, please specify which SDG is the most relevant to the initiative. (hold Ctrl to select multiple)
Goal 3: Good Health
Which target(s) within the SDGs specified above is the initiative relevant to? (hold Ctrl to select multiple)
3.8 Achieve universal health coverage, including financial risk protection, access to quality essential health-care services and access to safe, effective, quality and affordable essential medicines and vaccines for all

Question 9: Validation Consent

Do you have any objections to us inquiring about the initiative for validation purposes? No

How did you know about UNPSA?

How did you know about UNPSA? Circulated letter from Office of Public Sector Development Commission, Thailand, and Department of Health's past submission

Nomination form

Questions/Answers

Question 1

Please describe the objective of the initiative introduced (200 words maximum)
The transformation to ageing society has a great impact on national development and national economic growth in the long run, in terms of budget provision, economy, and the citizens’ quality of life, as a whole. Nowadays, the government spends large budgets for elderly care, such as elderly welfare and health care allowance which has risen every year due to the larger population of the elderly. According to the Thailand Development Research Institute’s report, supported by the Thai Health Promotion Foundation, showed that Thailand’s health care expenditure had increased rapidly. It was predicted that the expenditure in the next 15 years, according to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD) framework, will be approximately 4.8 – 6.3 hundred billion THB. Moreover, other factors in the ageing society will push the expenditure up to 1.4 – 1.8 trillion THB. The Department of Health’s mission is cooperative and sustainable health system development and governance aiming at “The locals are healthy. The health care officers are happy. The health care system is sustainable.” Therefore, this System Development for Long Term Care in Community through 3C’s Innovation (Care Manager, Caregiver, and Care Plan) was carried out, in order to make “The Smiley Siam” for all Thais.

Question 2

Please explain how the initiative is linked to the category and criteria selected (100 words maximum)
The main criterion was integrative cooperation in planning, developing, and carrying out the innovation. The procedures started from designing and running the first care manager curriculum in Thailand, developing and using a caregiver curriculum, pushing the curriculum as a national agenda, developing a long-term care database system, and developing an online care plan for a smooth, steady and short flow of the processes, and for greater cooperation between organizations, so that health care service system for the elderly and dependent persons is entrusted, accessible, and continuous.

Question 3

Please describe in what ways the initiative is contributing to the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the realization of the SDGs. Specify which SDG(s) it is relevant to. (100 words maximum)
The Department of Health has pushed and driven long-term elderly care in community through 3C’s Innovation to be a crucial policy formulating a strategy plan for integrative works with partnership networks under the 3S’s Strategy, that was 1) Social (Family and community as a strong institution), 2) Strong Health (The elderly have good health.), and 3) Security (The welfare system and support services with quality standards access). The strategy does support the achievement of the third goal of the 2030 Agenda—Good Health and Well-being.

Question 4

The initiative must have positive impact on a group or groups of the population, especially the vulnerable (i.e. children, women, older persons, people with disabilities, etc.) within the context of your country or region. Please explain how the initiative has addressed a significant shortfall in governance, public administration or public service within the context of a given country or region. (200 words maximum)
According to the implement of the System Development for Long-term Care in Community through 3C’s Innovation (Care Manager, Caregiver, and Care Plan), 7,001,490 elderly people throughout Thailand were given health evaluation and screening. 6,769,607 (96.69%) of them were social-bound elderly; 188,979 (2.70%) of them were home-bound elderly; and 42,604 (0.61%) of them were bed-bound elderly. Regarding the Health Data Center, Ministry of Health’s data recorded on 4 April 2018, 187,890 dependent elderly people received continuing home health care following an individual care plan had better health. 1,952 bed-bound elderly became home-bound, and 7,412 home-bound ones became social-bound. 4,797 (66.1%) out of 7,255 subdistricts in Thailand met the criteria of standard long term care. Thus, the System Development for Long Term Care in Community through 3C’s Innovation (Care Manager, Caregiver, and Care Plan) is an innovation that builds up values and honor in humanity, allows accessible health care and well-being for the elderly, deducts expenses for the citizens, societies, and government, and supports the national stability and prosperity sustainably, as it was stated in the Thailand 4.0 Development Plan.

Question 5

a. Please explain in which way the initiative is innovative in the context of your country or region (100 words maximum)
The Long Term Care in Community through 3C’s Innovation aimed at minimizing the crowd in hospitals, reducing wait time to receive treatment, increasing opportunities for inclusive and equal medical service system by changing wards to home health care in community, transforming chief nurses into Care Managers who take care of the elderly at home or in community based on the Care Plan with cooperation from the elderly’s family and community, having volunteer Caregivers who were trained to master elderly care skills following the Care Plan and were assigned by the Care Manager regarding the Thailand’s Elderly Rights and Benefits Package.
b. Please describe if the innovation is original or if it is an adaptation from other contexts (100 words maximum)
Systematic development allowed the officials to study elderly care systems in various countries. The systematic development also reflected the strength of Thai society that values the elderly and reciprocates to parents and senior relatives. As a result, the elderly care system was purely based on Thai culture. The Thailand’s Care Manager Curriculum (70 hours) was applied from the Japan’s Manager Curriculum (44 hours). However, the Caregiver curriculum was formulated by the Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health; and the online Care Plan was Thailand’s initiation.

Question 6

Has the initiative been transferred and adapted to in other contexts (e.g. other cities, countries or regions) to your organization’s knowledge? If yes, please explain (100 words maximum)
The transfer and processes were begun from training Care Managers. The first pilot batch of Teacher A operated in 100 areas in 2015. Later in 2016, training were arranged to build Teacher A in every regional health office in every district. There were also regional and national meetings held for experience and learning exchanges. To spread out the knowledge and operations of this innovative project to the ASEAN nations, national seminars and ASEAN regional seminars on long-term care were held; besides, organizations from many countries, such as China, Japan, and Vietnam, took field trips to Thailand to learn the project.

Question 7

a. What resources (i.e. financial, human or others) were used to implement the initiative? (100 words maximum)
This 3C’s long term care innovation has been accepted by the locals and in societies, as it became one of the government’s precedent policies. The government provided financial and personnel development supports for the project. Care Managers and Caregivers were produced more for thorough care for home-bound and bed-bound elderly throughout Thailand. Personnel in organizations related to the Ministry of Public Health, local administration offices, local networks, as well as the locals also took part. In addition, the government supports the Care Plan budget through the NHSO and develops personnel’s proficiency to long-term care data base and related skills.
b. Please describe whether and how the initiative is sustainable (covering the social, economic and environmental aspects) (200 words maximum)
1) Communities are crucial for making sustainable impacts on the use of 3C’s long term care innovation. Caregivers are younger generations in the elderly’s communities who will take parts in taking care of the elderly, giving knowledge about the project to raise awareness, calling their neighbors to participate, and administrating elderly care funds. 2) In policy level, MOU’s with the Ministry of Interior, and the Ministry of Social Development and Social Security were signed; while, the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Education are in charge of the elderly care in communities where there are committees in regions and provinces. 3) Regarding the role assignment, Care Managers in the operating areas work with multidisciplinary team. Care Managers evaluate and screen the elderly, collect information of the elderly who need the proactive cares, make Care Plan for individual elderly, arrange Care Conference to coordinate with their partners following the Team Building Plan, administrate and conduct Caregivers’ operations, and evaluate the operation plan and outcomes for further development. However, for sustainability, the attempt was to push this long term care treatment as a right and welfare for all elderly.

Question 8

a. Has the initiative been formally evaluated either through internal or external evaluation?
Yes
This long term care through 3C’s innovation project has been followed and evaluated by the government continuously. It was assigned to be followed-up and supervised by the DoH, MoPH, and related organizations, such as the Budget Bureau, the State Audit Office of Thailand, National Legislative Assembly, and civil society organizations. The Bureau of Elderly Health has to report the operations and progress of the project to the government monthly, as well as every three, six, nine, and twelve months. The results are evaluated, analyzed, and synthesized to improve, and develop the quality of the services and to revise the policy.
b. Please describe the indicators that were used (100 words maximum)
Major indicators were 1) number of the elderly accessible for, or utilizing the long term care through 3C’s innovation 2) number of trained Care Mangers 3) number of trained Caregivers 4) number of the elderly receiving the health care following the individual care plan. 5) this project is also one of main indicator under “Integration to Create Equality to Support Ageing Society” of Thai government.
c. Please describe the outcome of the evaluation (100 words maximum)
According to the previous operations, 187,890 dependent elderly, both home-bound and bed-bound, utilized the innovation. 12,279 Care Mangers passed the training; and 74,833 Caregivers passed the training. Moreover, 187,890 elderly people received the health care based on the Care Plan, and all of them had better health. In details, 1,952 bed-bound elderly became home-bound, and 7,412 home-bound elderly became social-bound.

Question 9

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development puts emphasis on collaboration, engagement, coordination, partnerships, and inclusion. Please describe what and how stakeholders were engaged in designing, implementing and evaluating the initiative. Please also highlight their roles and contributions (200 words maximum)
The System Development for Long Term Care in Community through 3C’s Innovation was carried out with different types of the elderly in different places and with different health care needs. The major stakeholder is the elderly and their families who agreed to get the service following the individual care plan performed by volunteer caregivers who are paid only a little by the government. Care Managers are mostly government officials working for subdistrict health promoting hospitals, community hospitals, and family doctor teams. They all work cooperatively with multidisciplinary team from local administration organizations, houses, temples, schools, religious organizations, local elderly clubs, subdistrict health fund committees, district health boards, provincial public health offices, the NHSO, also Maejo University that developed the long-term care data base, and other networks taking parts in works for the improvement of the elderly’s well-being.

Question 10

Please describe the key lessons learned, and any view you have on how to further improve the initiative (100 words maximum)
1) Integrative actions are fundamental for sustainable operation development. Care Managers support, develop, coordinate, and allocate resources to make the most of them. 2) Caregivers’ work is still voluntary that is a limitation. To improve, there should be formal and informal caregivers. Payment system which is in the form of time bank, considered to be more suitable, must also be improved. 3) The 3C’s innovation database and Care Plan technology should be developed for accessibility to reduce burden on report, which gives them encouragement to work and allows much time for them to take care of the elderly more effectively.

Return to list

Please wait...