Basic Info

Por favor revise antes de enviar

Información del nominado

Información institucional

País Tailandia
Nombre de la Institución Department of Livestock Development
Tipo de Institución Ministerio
Tipo de Ministerio Ministerio de Agricultura y Alimentación
Nivel administrativo Nacional
Nombre de la Iniciativa Integrated participation for effective management of Thailand school milk program
Años operacionales del proyecto 1
Página web de la institución www.dld.go.th

Pregunta 1: Acerca de la iniciativa

¿Se trata de una iniciativa del sector público? Si

Pregunta 2: Categorías

¿Es la iniciativa relevante para una de las categorías de UNPSA? Making institutions inclusive and ensuring participation in decision-making
UNPSACriteria
2017.2.1 Introduces an idea, policy, practice or structure that is distinctively new, innovative and unique in the context of a given country or region Enhance the formal and informal participation of all individuals and groups in public decision-making processes or policies, approaches and measures related to public services and other aspects impacting on their lives. Institutionalize and/or strengthen participatory decision-making and consultation processes at the national and local level
2017.2.10 Promotes Participation through New Institutional Mechanisms
2017.2.4 Promulgates new or strengthens existing legislation, policy, regulation or measure to fight discrimination, exclusion and exploitation, and to extend access to public services and developmental opportunities, assets and resources for all, including women and girls, and the poorest and most vulnerable.
2017.2.6 Implements new processes and institutional mechanisms to channel the demands and views of people and enables governments – policy makers and public officials – to better interact with the public, particularly individual people, and allows people, for instance, to better express their needs, participate in and influence policy-making; comment on policy implementation; provide feedback on government services (on and off-line services); and file complaints.
2017.2.7 Clearly supports inclusion, participation and engagement of all people, irrespective of sex, age, race or ethnicity, including through focusing on specific groups of the population and especially those in vulnerable situations, so that after the effective implementation of the initiative, all or some of these groups can participate more fully in society and in decision-making.
2017.2.8 Institutes, nationally and/or locally, multi-stakeholder engagement processes.
2017.2.9 Enhances responsiveness of government to the demands and needs of citizens and ensures the inclusion of the views of concerned sections of the community in public affairs.

Pregunta 3: Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

¿La iniciativa es relevante para alguno(s) de los 17 ODS? Si
¿Para cuáles de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) y de sus metas es más relevante la iniciativa?
17 Alianzas para lograr los objetivos
¿Para qué meta(s) de los ODS especificados anteriormente es relevante la iniciativa?
17.17 Fomentar y promover la constitución de alianzas eficaces en las esferas pública, público-privada y de la sociedad civil, aprovechando la experiencia y las estrategias de obtención de recursos de las alianzas

Pregunta 4: Fecha de Implementacióm

¿Se ha implementado la iniciativa durante dos años o más? Si
Proporcione la fecha de implementación 01 feb. 2008

Pregunta 5: Socios

¿Las Naciones Unidas o algún organismo de las Naciones Unidas ha participado en esta iniciativa? No
¿Qué agencia de Naciones Unidas estuvo involucrada?
Comisión Preparatoria de la Organización del Tratado de Prohibición Completa de los Ensayos Nucleares
Por favor proporcione detalles

Question 6: Supporting documentation

¿La iniciativa cuenta con documentación sustentoria? Si

Pregunta 7: Premios UNPSA

¿La iniciativa ha ganado ya un Premio de Naciones Unidas al Servicio Público? No

Pregunta 8: Otros Premios

¿Ha ganado la iniciativa algún otro Premio al Servicio Público? No

Pregunta 9: ¿Cómo se enteró de UNPSA?

¿Cómo se enteró de UNPSA? Website Colleague Newspaper

Pregunta 10: Consentimiento de validación

Doy mi consentimiento para contactar personas y entidades relevantes para preguntar sobre la iniciativa con fines de validación. No

Pregunta 1: Acerca de la iniciativa

¿Se trata de una iniciativa del sector público? Si

Pregunta 2: Categorías

¿Es la iniciativa relevante para una de las categorías de UNPSA? Making institutions inclusive and ensuring participation in decision-making
UNPSACriteria
2017.2.1 Introduces an idea, policy, practice or structure that is distinctively new, innovative and unique in the context of a given country or region Enhance the formal and informal participation of all individuals and groups in public decision-making processes or policies, approaches and measures related to public services and other aspects impacting on their lives. Institutionalize and/or strengthen participatory decision-making and consultation processes at the national and local level
2017.2.10 Promotes Participation through New Institutional Mechanisms
2017.2.4 Promulgates new or strengthens existing legislation, policy, regulation or measure to fight discrimination, exclusion and exploitation, and to extend access to public services and developmental opportunities, assets and resources for all, including women and girls, and the poorest and most vulnerable.
2017.2.6 Implements new processes and institutional mechanisms to channel the demands and views of people and enables governments – policy makers and public officials – to better interact with the public, particularly individual people, and allows people, for instance, to better express their needs, participate in and influence policy-making; comment on policy implementation; provide feedback on government services (on and off-line services); and file complaints.
2017.2.7 Clearly supports inclusion, participation and engagement of all people, irrespective of sex, age, race or ethnicity, including through focusing on specific groups of the population and especially those in vulnerable situations, so that after the effective implementation of the initiative, all or some of these groups can participate more fully in society and in decision-making.
2017.2.8 Institutes, nationally and/or locally, multi-stakeholder engagement processes.
2017.2.9 Enhances responsiveness of government to the demands and needs of citizens and ensures the inclusion of the views of concerned sections of the community in public affairs.

Pregunta 3: Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

¿La iniciativa es relevante para alguno(s) de los 17 ODS? Si
¿Para cuáles de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) y de sus metas es más relevante la iniciativa?
17 Alianzas para lograr los objetivos
¿Para qué meta(s) de los ODS especificados anteriormente es relevante la iniciativa?
17.17 Fomentar y promover la constitución de alianzas eficaces en las esferas pública, público-privada y de la sociedad civil, aprovechando la experiencia y las estrategias de obtención de recursos de las alianzas

Pregunta 4: Fecha de Implementacióm

¿Se ha implementado la iniciativa durante dos años o más? Si
Proporcione la fecha de implementación 01 feb. 2008

Pregunta 5: Socios

¿Las Naciones Unidas o algún organismo de las Naciones Unidas ha participado en esta iniciativa? No
¿Qué agencia de Naciones Unidas estuvo involucrada?
Comisión Preparatoria de la Organización del Tratado de Prohibición Completa de los Ensayos Nucleares
Por favor proporcione detalles

Question 6: Supporting documentation

¿La iniciativa cuenta con documentación sustentoria? Si

Pregunta 7: Premios UNPSA

¿La iniciativa ha ganado ya un Premio de Naciones Unidas al Servicio Público? No

Pregunta 8: Otros Premios

¿Ha ganado la iniciativa algún otro Premio al Servicio Público? No

Pregunta 9: ¿Cómo se enteró de UNPSA?

¿Cómo se enteró de UNPSA? Website Colleague Newspaper

Pregunta 10: Consentimiento de validación

Doy mi consentimiento para contactar personas y entidades relevantes para preguntar sobre la iniciativa con fines de validación. No

Pregunta 1: Acerca de la iniciativa

¿Se trata de una iniciativa del sector público? Si

Pregunta 2: Categorías

¿Es la iniciativa relevante para una de las categorías de UNPSA? Making institutions inclusive and ensuring participation in decision-making
UNPSACriteria
2017.2.1 Introduces an idea, policy, practice or structure that is distinctively new, innovative and unique in the context of a given country or region Enhance the formal and informal participation of all individuals and groups in public decision-making processes or policies, approaches and measures related to public services and other aspects impacting on their lives. Institutionalize and/or strengthen participatory decision-making and consultation processes at the national and local level
2017.2.10 Promotes Participation through New Institutional Mechanisms
2017.2.4 Promulgates new or strengthens existing legislation, policy, regulation or measure to fight discrimination, exclusion and exploitation, and to extend access to public services and developmental opportunities, assets and resources for all, including women and girls, and the poorest and most vulnerable.
2017.2.6 Implements new processes and institutional mechanisms to channel the demands and views of people and enables governments – policy makers and public officials – to better interact with the public, particularly individual people, and allows people, for instance, to better express their needs, participate in and influence policy-making; comment on policy implementation; provide feedback on government services (on and off-line services); and file complaints.
2017.2.7 Clearly supports inclusion, participation and engagement of all people, irrespective of sex, age, race or ethnicity, including through focusing on specific groups of the population and especially those in vulnerable situations, so that after the effective implementation of the initiative, all or some of these groups can participate more fully in society and in decision-making.
2017.2.8 Institutes, nationally and/or locally, multi-stakeholder engagement processes.
2017.2.9 Enhances responsiveness of government to the demands and needs of citizens and ensures the inclusion of the views of concerned sections of the community in public affairs.

Question 3: Implementation Date

¿Se ha implementado la iniciativa durante dos años o más? Si
Proporcione la fecha de implementación 01 feb. 2008

Question 4: Partners/Stakeholders

¿Las Naciones Unidas o algún organismo de las Naciones Unidas ha participado en esta iniciativa? No
¿Qué agencia de Naciones Unidas estuvo involucrada?
Comisión Preparatoria de la Organización del Tratado de Prohibición Completa de los Ensayos Nucleares
Por favor proporcione detalles

Question 5: Required Supplemental Documents

¿La iniciativa cuenta con documentación sustentoria? Si

Question 6: UNPSA Awards

¿La iniciativa ha ganado ya un Premio de Naciones Unidas al Servicio Público? No

Question 7: Other Awards

Has the initiative won other Public Service Awards? No

Question 8: Sustainable Development Goals

¿La iniciativa es relevante para alguno(s) de los 17 ODS? Si
¿Para cuáles de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) y de sus metas es más relevante la iniciativa?
17 Alianzas para lograr los objetivos
¿Para qué meta(s) de los ODS especificados anteriormente es relevante la iniciativa?
17.17 Fomentar y promover la constitución de alianzas eficaces en las esferas pública, público-privada y de la sociedad civil, aprovechando la experiencia y las estrategias de obtención de recursos de las alianzas

Question 9: Validation Consent

¿Tiene alguna objeción a que solicitemos información sobre la iniciativa para propósitos de validación? No

How did you know about UNPSA?

How did you know about UNPSA? Website Colleague Newspaper

Nomination form

Questions/Answers

Pregunta 1

Proporcione un breve resumen de la iniciativa que incluya los problemas / desafíos abordados y las soluciones que introdujo esta iniciativa (máximo 300 palabras)
Thailand started school milk program in 1992 to promote good health in children following the recommendation by the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations that milk is a food that could be provided to children to prevent undernutrition. Classical directive management at early stages of the program proved to be unfruitful. The issue was further complicated with unsold fresh milk problem of local dairy farmers. After years of experiments and developments, a participatory management model was implemented. A multi-sector representation of stakeholders in Thai dairy industry food chain including government authorities, private companies and organizations, dairy farmers and entrepreneurs was formed and named “Milk Board”. The integrated committee serves as an umbrella policy making group for optimal and sustainable development of Thai dairy farming and industry. The Milk Board works through its eleven subcommittees that concentrate on each specific area. The participatory management model has been successful resulting in comprehensive policy development for Thai dairy industry and effective management of school milk program. The ultimate benefits have been achieved as follows: 1) good health for preschool and primary school children as observed by a significantly reduced in undernutrition situation, especially among under-fives; 2) better quality of life for local dairy farmers as they have a stable and secure source of income through selling quality fresh milk to the school milk program; 3) quality enhancement of dairy farming and industry as characterized by milk quality, farming conditions and standards, logistics, and packaging, and 4) better delivery of public services to general population as reported by government service satisfaction surveys.
a. ¿Cuáles son los objetivos generales de la iniciativa? Describa los objetivos generales de la iniciativa (máximo 200 palabras)
The participatory management model of Thailand school milk program had two main objectives: 1) to increase participation of stakeholders in decision making processes and 2) to maximize their collaborative contributions to effective implementation of the program.
b. ¿Cómo encaja la iniciativa dentro de la categoría seleccionada? Describa cómo la iniciativa está vinculada a los criterios de la categoría (máximo 200 palabras)
The initiative introduced an innovative participatory management model. To ensure an optimal and sustainable management system of the school milk program, multi-stakeholder engagements have been practiced at both national and local levels. Representatives of a diverse group of stakeholders including government agencies, dairy farmers and industry, public and private schools, and local administrations have participated in relevant committee or subcommittee(s). and contributed their knowledge and skills that leading to the development of a new management model. Nationally, a central administrative committee named “Milk Board” has been appointed to make decision on issues involving dairy farming and industry in Thailand. Milk Board then works by appointing subcommittees with specific assignments. Inputs to decision from a diverse group of stakeholders provide a wider choice of options and a better chance of making a valid decision.

Pregunta 2

La iniciativa debe mejorar la vida de las personas, en particular mejorando la contribución de los servicios públicos a la aplicación de la Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible y la realización de los ODS.
a. Explique cómo la iniciativa mejora la prestación de servicios públicos (Máximo 200 palabras)
The participatory management model presented here was in line with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 17: Partnerships for the goals. The model has illustrated a well-orchestrated collaboration among stakeholders to enhance the better delivery of public services to the needy or underprivileged, i.e. school children and local dairy farmers. The school milk program provides quality fresh milk to school children nationwide, especially those in rural areas, and sustainable development of local dairy farming and industry.

Pregunta 3

La iniciativa debe tener un impacto positivo en un grupo o grupos de la población (es decir, niños, mujeres, ancianos, personas con discapacidad, etc.) y abordar una cuestión importante en la prestación de servicios públicos en el contexto de un país o región determinados.
a. Explique cómo la iniciativa ha abordado un problema importante relacionado con la prestación de servicios públicos (Máximo 200 palabras)
Prior to the establishment of Milk Board, there were several important issues involving dairy farming and industry such as quality improvement, pricing system and milk powder importation. And then came a very complicated issue, Thailand school milk program. Stakeholders involving school milk program include central and local authorities, large companies and organizations, local dairy farmers and entrepreneurs, and public and private schools. In earlier time, Thailand School Milk Program experienced such problems as poor management and lack of transparency. But after years of development, it has become clear that inclusion of a diverse group of organizations and participants with enhanced legitimacy helps to succeed.
b. Explique cómo la iniciativa ha impactado positivamente a un grupo o grupos de la población en el contexto de su país o región. (Máximo 200 palabras)
The success of Thailand school milk program has a positive impact on a diverse groups of Thai people. First, children: more than 7.5 million school children (K1-3 and Grades 1-6) are in good health through nutrients and health benefits provided by school milk. A significant reduction of stunting among school children has been observed, especially those under-fives. It has been widely acknowledged that healthy children will benefit more from education. Second, dairy farmers: their well-being has been strengthened by providing an outlet for their locally produced milk. They secure a regular and stable source of income by selling quality fresh milk to the program. Thailand school milk program plays an important role in the Thai dairy market since it takes in as much as 30% of the total liquid milk market (approx. 1,200 tons per day). Third, dairy farming and industry: local dairy farming has greatly developed both in capacity-building and quality improvement.

Pregunta 4

La iniciativa debe presentar una idea innovadora, un enfoque distintivamente nuevo o una política o enfoque único implementado para realizar los ODS en el contexto de un país o región determinados.
a. Explique de qué manera la iniciativa es innovadora en el contexto de su país o región (Máximo 200 palabras)
The innovation of the initiative is the participatory management model. All stakeholders in Thai dairy industry food chain are included during decision making processes and policy development. To ensure an optimal and sustainable development of Thai dairy farming and industry, the mechanism of “three shared characteristics” was deployed. First, they have shared interest in dairy industry. Second, they have shared desire to collaborate for the better dairy industry. Third, they have shared benefits in dairy market. Each entity engaged in the school milk program has taken their roles and responsibilities corresponding to their area of competency and relevancy to achieved the ultimate goal of promoting good health for children and better quality of life for dairy farmers.

Pregunta 4b

b. Describa si la innovación es original o si es una adaptación de otros contextos (en caso de tener conocimiento de que ésta iniciativa es una adaptación) (Máximo 200 palabras)
The participatory management model presented is an original innovation. Milk Board and its subcommittees have their roles on the entire dairy industry food chain--from farm to table.

Pregunta 4c

c. ¿Qué recursos (financieros, humanos, materiales u otros recursos, etc.) se usaron para implementar la iniciativa? (Máximo 200 palabras)
Currently, the Royal Thai Government allocated the annual budget Bt14,000 M for school milk program. The program delivers free fresh quality milk to about 7.5 Million children in all public and private school (K1-3 to Grade 6) for 260 days per calendar year.

Pregunta 5

La iniciativa debe ser adaptable a otros contextos (por ejemplo, otras ciudades, países o regiones). Es posible que ya exista evidencia de que la iniciativa ha inspirado innovaciones similares en otras instituciones del sector público dentro de un país, región o a nivel global.
a. ¿La iniciativa ha sido transferida a otros contextos?
Si
Having succeeded in school milk program under a specially structured committee named “Milk Board”, Thailand has now extended the practice of participatory governance to other commodity-oriented decision making processes. For example, “Beef Board”, “Egg Board” and “Pig Board”.

Pregunta 6

La iniciativa debería poder mantenerse durante un período de tiempo significativo.
a. Describa si la iniciativa es sostenible y cómo (cubriendo aspectos sociales, económicos y ambientales). (Máximo 300 palabras)
Sustainability is the heart of our work. The presented participatory management model has shown to be sustainable. It integrates multi-sector organizations such as government authorities, private companies and organizations,and dairy farmers and entrepreneurs into win-win environment.
b. Describa si la iniciativa es sostenible en términos de durabilidad en tiempo actual y cómo es sostenible. (Máximo 300 palabras)
More than a decade ago, Thailand passed the legislation establishing Milk Board on January 31, 2008. The presented participatory management model still functions very well at current situation. Under the protocols and procedures developed by Milk Board and its subcommittees, quality improvement in dairy industry has been observed continuously.

Pregunta 7

La iniciativa debe haber pasado por una evaluación formal que muestre alguna evidencia del impacto en la mejora de la vida de las personas
a. ¿La iniciativa ha sido evaluada formalmente?
Si
Si la respuesta es “Sí”, describa cómo fue evaluada la iniciativa (Máximo 200 palabras)
Thailand school milk program has gone through three formal evaluations in 2012, 2014 and 2016 by means of document reviews, personal interviews and stakeholder surveys. The evaluation process involves all stakeholders including an overseeing government agency, dairy entrepreneurs, local authorities, schools and students.
b. Describa el resultado de la evaluación sobre el impacto de la iniciativa. (Máximo 200 palabras)
The 2016 evaluation report concluded that overall milk quality management system has been in good standing. Student surveys showed that the students were satisfied with the provided school milk. Dairy entrepreneurs were satisfied with the current rights and eligibility system. But they requested no-delayed payments. Purchasing process transparency assessment of local authorities indicated the process was practical, but could be strengthened on problem of unmatched numbers between requested and provided school milk packages.
c. Describa los indicadores utilizados. (Máximo 200 palabras)
Thailand school milk program is subject to formal evaluation in the areas of milk quality management system, dairy entrepreneur rights and eligibility assessment, and purchasing process transparency.

Pregunta 8

La iniciativa debe demostrar que, dentro de lo posible, ha involucrado a diversos actores, como por ejemplo otras instituciones, la sociedad civil o el sector privado.
a. La Agenda para el Desarrollo 2030 pone énfasis en la colaboración, el compromiso, la coordinación, las alianzas y la inclusión. Describa qué partes interesadas participaron en el diseño, la implementación y la evaluación de la iniciativa. Por favor, también resaltar sus roles y contribuciones (Máximo 300 palabras)
The participatory management model of Milk Board and its eleven subcommittees shares the same structure of stakeholders inclusive. Milk Board is responsible for overall decision making and policy on Thai dairy industry, while each subcommittee concentrates on one specific assigned area: subcommittee on strategic planning, subcommittee on fresh milk purchasing standard, subcommittee on milk management system, subcommittee on school milk program, subcommittee on milk production cost, subcommittee on milk pricing system, subcommittee on milk powder and dairy products importation, subcommittee on promotion of milk consumption, subcommittee on milk quality improvement, subcommittee on technical advisory and subcommittee on fine and punishment. Stakeholders, through their representatives in Milk Board and its subcommittees, actively participate in activities such as setting goals, determining action plans and making contributions to decisions. With a broader view of the situation and a wider choice of options, Milk Board and its subcommittees have a better chance to make a valid decision. Besides, all involved partners have been more committed to the decisions they have made.

Pregunta 9

a. Describa las lecciones claves aprendidas, y cualquier otra opinión que usted tenga para mejorar aún más la iniciativa (Máximo 300 palabras)
In earlier years, Thailand School Milk Program experienced such problems as poor management and lack of transparency. But over the years of experiments and developments, it has become absolutely clear that inclusion of a diverse group of organizations and participants with enhanced legitimacy helps to succeed. And the fact that the presented participatory management model, Milk Board and its eleven subcommittees, handles the demands and interests of all stakeholders in an institutionalized settings, so positive-sum interactions are more likely achievable. Moreover, all involved partners are more committed to whatever decisions they have made.

Volver a la lista

Favor esperar...