Basic Info

Por favor revise antes de enviar

Información del nominado

Información institucional

País Kirguistán
Nombre de la Institución Central Commission for Elections and Referenda of the Kyrgyz Republic
Tipo de Institución Agencia Pública
Nivel administrativo Nacional
Nombre de la Iniciativa Precinct count optical scanner (PCOS)
Años operacionales del proyecto 2
Página web de la institución www.shailoo.gov.kg

Pregunta 1: Acerca de la iniciativa

¿Se trata de una iniciativa del sector público? Si

Pregunta 2: Categorías

¿Es la iniciativa relevante para una de las categorías de UNPSA? Making institutions inclusive and ensuring participation in decision-making
UNPSACriteria
2017.2.1 Introduces an idea, policy, practice or structure that is distinctively new, innovative and unique in the context of a given country or region Enhance the formal and informal participation of all individuals and groups in public decision-making processes or policies, approaches and measures related to public services and other aspects impacting on their lives. Institutionalize and/or strengthen participatory decision-making and consultation processes at the national and local level
2017.2.10 Promotes Participation through New Institutional Mechanisms
2017.2.2 Strengthen the capacity of national or local governments and public institutions responsible for overseeing or delivering public services to engage people in preparing and implementing decisions, especially the poor and vulnerable people
2017.2.3 Promote a professional, merit based and well equipped civil service to ensure continuous and consistent institutional performance for an effective public services delivery
2017.2.4 Promulgates new or strengthens existing legislation, policy, regulation or measure to fight discrimination, exclusion and exploitation, and to extend access to public services and developmental opportunities, assets and resources for all, including women and girls, and the poorest and most vulnerable.
2017.2.5 Promotes the application of the existing legal and regulatory framework relevant to anti-discrimination and inclusion, or develop additional laws and regulations that foster changes in norms, attitudes and behavior that combat discrimination, including through promoting diversity, dialogue, interaction and collaboration.
2017.2.6 Implements new processes and institutional mechanisms to channel the demands and views of people and enables governments – policy makers and public officials – to better interact with the public, particularly individual people, and allows people, for instance, to better express their needs, participate in and influence policy-making; comment on policy implementation; provide feedback on government services (on and off-line services); and file complaints.
2017.2.7 Clearly supports inclusion, participation and engagement of all people, irrespective of sex, age, race or ethnicity, including through focusing on specific groups of the population and especially those in vulnerable situations, so that after the effective implementation of the initiative, all or some of these groups can participate more fully in society and in decision-making.
2017.2.8 Institutes, nationally and/or locally, multi-stakeholder engagement processes.
2017.2.9 Enhances responsiveness of government to the demands and needs of citizens and ensures the inclusion of the views of concerned sections of the community in public affairs.

Pregunta 3: Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

¿La iniciativa es relevante para alguno(s) de los 17 ODS? Si
¿Para cuáles de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) y de sus metas es más relevante la iniciativa?
16 Paz, justicia e instituciones sólidas
¿Para qué meta(s) de los ODS especificados anteriormente es relevante la iniciativa?
.
16.3 Promover el estado de derecho en los planos nacional e internacional y garantizar la igualdad de acceso a la justicia para todos
16.5 Reducir considerablemente la corrupción y el soborno en todas sus formas
16.6 Crear a todos los niveles instituciones eficaces y transparentes que rindan cuentas
16.7 Garantizar la adopción en todos los niveles de decisiones inclusivas, participativas y representativas que respondan a las necesidades
16.10 Garantizar el acceso público a la información y proteger las libertades fundamentales, de conformidad con las leyes nacionales y los acuerdos internacionales
16.b Promover y aplicar leyes y políticas no discriminatorias en favor del desarrollo sostenible

Pregunta 4: Fecha de Implementacióm

¿Se ha implementado la iniciativa durante dos años o más? Si
Proporcione la fecha de implementación 04 oct. 2015

Pregunta 5: Socios

¿Las Naciones Unidas o algún organismo de las Naciones Unidas ha participado en esta iniciativa? No
¿Qué agencia de Naciones Unidas estuvo involucrada?
Comisión Preparatoria de la Organización del Tratado de Prohibición Completa de los Ensayos Nucleares
Por favor proporcione detalles

Question 6: Supporting documentation

¿La iniciativa cuenta con documentación sustentoria? Si

Pregunta 7: Premios UNPSA

¿La iniciativa ha ganado ya un Premio de Naciones Unidas al Servicio Público? No

Pregunta 8: Otros Premios

¿Ha ganado la iniciativa algún otro Premio al Servicio Público? No

Pregunta 9: ¿Cómo se enteró de UNPSA?

¿Cómo se enteró de UNPSA? www.unpan.org

Pregunta 10: Consentimiento de validación

Doy mi consentimiento para contactar personas y entidades relevantes para preguntar sobre la iniciativa con fines de validación. No

Pregunta 1: Acerca de la iniciativa

¿Se trata de una iniciativa del sector público? Si

Pregunta 2: Categorías

¿Es la iniciativa relevante para una de las categorías de UNPSA? Making institutions inclusive and ensuring participation in decision-making
UNPSACriteria
2017.2.1 Introduces an idea, policy, practice or structure that is distinctively new, innovative and unique in the context of a given country or region Enhance the formal and informal participation of all individuals and groups in public decision-making processes or policies, approaches and measures related to public services and other aspects impacting on their lives. Institutionalize and/or strengthen participatory decision-making and consultation processes at the national and local level
2017.2.10 Promotes Participation through New Institutional Mechanisms
2017.2.2 Strengthen the capacity of national or local governments and public institutions responsible for overseeing or delivering public services to engage people in preparing and implementing decisions, especially the poor and vulnerable people
2017.2.3 Promote a professional, merit based and well equipped civil service to ensure continuous and consistent institutional performance for an effective public services delivery
2017.2.4 Promulgates new or strengthens existing legislation, policy, regulation or measure to fight discrimination, exclusion and exploitation, and to extend access to public services and developmental opportunities, assets and resources for all, including women and girls, and the poorest and most vulnerable.
2017.2.5 Promotes the application of the existing legal and regulatory framework relevant to anti-discrimination and inclusion, or develop additional laws and regulations that foster changes in norms, attitudes and behavior that combat discrimination, including through promoting diversity, dialogue, interaction and collaboration.
2017.2.6 Implements new processes and institutional mechanisms to channel the demands and views of people and enables governments – policy makers and public officials – to better interact with the public, particularly individual people, and allows people, for instance, to better express their needs, participate in and influence policy-making; comment on policy implementation; provide feedback on government services (on and off-line services); and file complaints.
2017.2.7 Clearly supports inclusion, participation and engagement of all people, irrespective of sex, age, race or ethnicity, including through focusing on specific groups of the population and especially those in vulnerable situations, so that after the effective implementation of the initiative, all or some of these groups can participate more fully in society and in decision-making.
2017.2.8 Institutes, nationally and/or locally, multi-stakeholder engagement processes.
2017.2.9 Enhances responsiveness of government to the demands and needs of citizens and ensures the inclusion of the views of concerned sections of the community in public affairs.

Pregunta 3: Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

¿La iniciativa es relevante para alguno(s) de los 17 ODS? Si
¿Para cuáles de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) y de sus metas es más relevante la iniciativa?
16 Paz, justicia e instituciones sólidas
¿Para qué meta(s) de los ODS especificados anteriormente es relevante la iniciativa?
.
16.3 Promover el estado de derecho en los planos nacional e internacional y garantizar la igualdad de acceso a la justicia para todos
16.5 Reducir considerablemente la corrupción y el soborno en todas sus formas
16.6 Crear a todos los niveles instituciones eficaces y transparentes que rindan cuentas
16.7 Garantizar la adopción en todos los niveles de decisiones inclusivas, participativas y representativas que respondan a las necesidades
16.10 Garantizar el acceso público a la información y proteger las libertades fundamentales, de conformidad con las leyes nacionales y los acuerdos internacionales
16.b Promover y aplicar leyes y políticas no discriminatorias en favor del desarrollo sostenible

Pregunta 4: Fecha de Implementacióm

¿Se ha implementado la iniciativa durante dos años o más? Si
Proporcione la fecha de implementación 04 oct. 2015

Pregunta 5: Socios

¿Las Naciones Unidas o algún organismo de las Naciones Unidas ha participado en esta iniciativa? No
¿Qué agencia de Naciones Unidas estuvo involucrada?
Comisión Preparatoria de la Organización del Tratado de Prohibición Completa de los Ensayos Nucleares
Por favor proporcione detalles

Question 6: Supporting documentation

¿La iniciativa cuenta con documentación sustentoria? Si

Pregunta 7: Premios UNPSA

¿La iniciativa ha ganado ya un Premio de Naciones Unidas al Servicio Público? No

Pregunta 8: Otros Premios

¿Ha ganado la iniciativa algún otro Premio al Servicio Público? No

Pregunta 9: ¿Cómo se enteró de UNPSA?

¿Cómo se enteró de UNPSA? www.unpan.org

Pregunta 10: Consentimiento de validación

Doy mi consentimiento para contactar personas y entidades relevantes para preguntar sobre la iniciativa con fines de validación. No

Pregunta 1: Acerca de la iniciativa

¿Se trata de una iniciativa del sector público? Si

Pregunta 2: Categorías

¿Es la iniciativa relevante para una de las categorías de UNPSA? Making institutions inclusive and ensuring participation in decision-making
UNPSACriteria
2017.2.1 Introduces an idea, policy, practice or structure that is distinctively new, innovative and unique in the context of a given country or region Enhance the formal and informal participation of all individuals and groups in public decision-making processes or policies, approaches and measures related to public services and other aspects impacting on their lives. Institutionalize and/or strengthen participatory decision-making and consultation processes at the national and local level
2017.2.10 Promotes Participation through New Institutional Mechanisms
2017.2.2 Strengthen the capacity of national or local governments and public institutions responsible for overseeing or delivering public services to engage people in preparing and implementing decisions, especially the poor and vulnerable people
2017.2.3 Promote a professional, merit based and well equipped civil service to ensure continuous and consistent institutional performance for an effective public services delivery
2017.2.4 Promulgates new or strengthens existing legislation, policy, regulation or measure to fight discrimination, exclusion and exploitation, and to extend access to public services and developmental opportunities, assets and resources for all, including women and girls, and the poorest and most vulnerable.
2017.2.5 Promotes the application of the existing legal and regulatory framework relevant to anti-discrimination and inclusion, or develop additional laws and regulations that foster changes in norms, attitudes and behavior that combat discrimination, including through promoting diversity, dialogue, interaction and collaboration.
2017.2.6 Implements new processes and institutional mechanisms to channel the demands and views of people and enables governments – policy makers and public officials – to better interact with the public, particularly individual people, and allows people, for instance, to better express their needs, participate in and influence policy-making; comment on policy implementation; provide feedback on government services (on and off-line services); and file complaints.
2017.2.7 Clearly supports inclusion, participation and engagement of all people, irrespective of sex, age, race or ethnicity, including through focusing on specific groups of the population and especially those in vulnerable situations, so that after the effective implementation of the initiative, all or some of these groups can participate more fully in society and in decision-making.
2017.2.8 Institutes, nationally and/or locally, multi-stakeholder engagement processes.
2017.2.9 Enhances responsiveness of government to the demands and needs of citizens and ensures the inclusion of the views of concerned sections of the community in public affairs.

Question 3: Implementation Date

¿Se ha implementado la iniciativa durante dos años o más? Si
Proporcione la fecha de implementación 04 oct. 2015

Question 4: Partners/Stakeholders

¿Las Naciones Unidas o algún organismo de las Naciones Unidas ha participado en esta iniciativa? No
¿Qué agencia de Naciones Unidas estuvo involucrada?
Comisión Preparatoria de la Organización del Tratado de Prohibición Completa de los Ensayos Nucleares
Por favor proporcione detalles

Question 5: Required Supplemental Documents

¿La iniciativa cuenta con documentación sustentoria? Si

Question 6: UNPSA Awards

¿La iniciativa ha ganado ya un Premio de Naciones Unidas al Servicio Público? No

Question 7: Other Awards

Has the initiative won other Public Service Awards? No

Question 8: Sustainable Development Goals

¿La iniciativa es relevante para alguno(s) de los 17 ODS? Si
¿Para cuáles de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) y de sus metas es más relevante la iniciativa?
16 Paz, justicia e instituciones sólidas
¿Para qué meta(s) de los ODS especificados anteriormente es relevante la iniciativa?
.
16.3 Promover el estado de derecho en los planos nacional e internacional y garantizar la igualdad de acceso a la justicia para todos
16.5 Reducir considerablemente la corrupción y el soborno en todas sus formas
16.6 Crear a todos los niveles instituciones eficaces y transparentes que rindan cuentas
16.7 Garantizar la adopción en todos los niveles de decisiones inclusivas, participativas y representativas que respondan a las necesidades
16.10 Garantizar el acceso público a la información y proteger las libertades fundamentales, de conformidad con las leyes nacionales y los acuerdos internacionales
16.b Promover y aplicar leyes y políticas no discriminatorias en favor del desarrollo sostenible

Question 9: Validation Consent

¿Tiene alguna objeción a que solicitemos información sobre la iniciativa para propósitos de validación? No

How did you know about UNPSA?

How did you know about UNPSA? www.unpan.org

Nomination form

Questions/Answers

Pregunta 1

Proporcione un breve resumen de la iniciativa que incluya los problemas / desafíos abordados y las soluciones que introdujo esta iniciativa (máximo 300 palabras)
Since its independence the people of the Kyrgyz Republic could observe that the attempts of blatant interference in the electoral process could lead, and especially while summarizing its results, achieving the desired result through falsification and fraud. The revolutions of 2005 and 2010 both were caused by unfair parliamentary and presidential elections which undermined voters' confidence in the elections, in the electoral system itself, and eventually in the state. Life demanded the need to reform and implement a new electoral model. Starting from 2015, an important component of the Kyrgyz Republic's orientation in its development on the principles of democracy and the rule of law is the reform of the electoral system. The whole package of reforms was carried out in accordance with the decision of the National Sustainable Development Council of the Kyrgyz Republic «Fair elections - a guarantee of sustainable development of the country» on April 25, 2014. For the first time in its history the Central Electoral Commission of the Kyrgyz Republic (CEC) introduced a new electoral process model which provides the use of new technologies for counting the votes of voters - precinct count optical scanners (PCOS) - and data transmission through secure communication channels to the central server of the CEC. The innovation was achieved by using these new information communication technologies to support the democratic process in the Kyrgyz Republic.
a. ¿Cuáles son los objetivos generales de la iniciativa? Describa los objetivos generales de la iniciativa (máximo 200 palabras)
At the moment Kyrgyz Republic has a new electoral model. Its main components are the equality of all candidates and the record of the vote of each voter. Because exactly these cornerstones of the reform of the electoral system are the basis of citizens' confidence in elections and in the future sustainable development of the country. There were two main tasks with the adoption of the new electoral model: the first task is to exclude corruption at the level of the electoral process management, the second is to ensure the rights of every citizen to elect and be elected. The past election campaigns showed that the CEC has chosen the right way to solve these tasks.
b. ¿Cómo encaja la iniciativa dentro de la categoría seleccionada? Describa cómo la iniciativa está vinculada a los criterios de la categoría (máximo 200 palabras)
Ensuring free democratic elections is one of the goals of the National Sustainable Development Strategy of the Kyrgyz Republic for 2013 - 2017. The new electoral model has allowed to ensure its maximum transparency and purity, created conditions for democratic and open competition, so that the results of the elections would not cause any doubts either among the citizens of the country or the participants in the election campaign.

Pregunta 2

La iniciativa debe mejorar la vida de las personas, en particular mejorando la contribución de los servicios públicos a la aplicación de la Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible y la realización de los ODS.
a. Explique cómo la iniciativa mejora la prestación de servicios públicos (Máximo 200 palabras)
In these years of reforms, an automated votes’ counting system is implemented that ensures the credibility of the election results, and the transparency of the decision-making process in election commissions is enhanced. Identification of voters with the help of biometric registration using a new form of identification and precinct count optical scanner (PCOS) has allowed to achieve the maximum credibility in the counting of votes. Following should be noted as important results of reforms: - the adoption of a law that ensures protection of personal data - reduction of the display of manual counting data along with PCOS data from 24 to 3-4 hours - extension of the electoral actions’ length on voter lists - technical measures for secrecy of voting have been strengthened

Pregunta 3

La iniciativa debe tener un impacto positivo en un grupo o grupos de la población (es decir, niños, mujeres, ancianos, personas con discapacidad, etc.) y abordar una cuestión importante en la prestación de servicios públicos en el contexto de un país o región determinados.
a. Explique cómo la iniciativa ha abordado un problema importante relacionado con la prestación de servicios públicos (Máximo 200 palabras)
The information electoral system has allowed publicly and visually on the CEC website to cover the process of voting in real time on 2375 polling stations, and the results of the counting of votes in each station and for each candidate for deputies have been reflected almost instantaneously or for no more than 1 hour. The training of the staff of the CEC office, members of the Territorial Elections Commissions (TEC) and Precinct Elections Commissions (PEC) ensured the effective functioning of new electoral technologies in the elections.
b. Explique cómo la iniciativa ha impactado positivamente a un grupo o grupos de la población en el contexto de su país o región. (Máximo 200 palabras)
At present, a system of reliable registration of each voter has been created in Kyrgyzstan, corruption risks in the sphere of the electoral process management have been virtually eliminated, voting procedures for various types of elections have been introduced and unified.

Pregunta 4

La iniciativa debe presentar una idea innovadora, un enfoque distintivamente nuevo o una política o enfoque único implementado para realizar los ODS en el contexto de un país o región determinados.
a. Explique de qué manera la iniciativa es innovadora en el contexto de su país o región (Máximo 200 palabras)
Information electoral system (IES) is designed to prepare and conduct as well as display information on the progress and outcome of elections and referenda. IES consists of: - PCOS for the receipt and reading of ballot papers in the precinct electoral commissions - IES software which performs the functions of collecting, storing and providing information on elections - secure communication channels for data transfer from PCOS to the central server in the CEC - server equipment, a complex of equipment for the maintenance of the IES software and information security PCOS consists of: - optical scanner of reading the ballot paper - ballot box - section for non-valid ballot papers - UPS and power cable - built-in printer - modem The home page ess.shailoo.gov.kg contains a table with a list of past and designated election campaigns, through which you can view information.

Pregunta 4b

b. Describa si la innovación es original o si es una adaptación de otros contextos (en caso de tener conocimiento de que ésta iniciativa es una adaptación) (Máximo 200 palabras)
Before the beginning of voting, a printing of the report on the beginning of voting - the zero report - is produced. A zero report is issued to all observers and representatives of candidates. From the moment of the beginning of voting to the end of the PCOS should not be connected to the modem; the number of voters taken from the PCOS screen is transferred to the precinct election commission on schedule. After the completion of voting, before sending data to the central server of the CEC, a report on the completion of voting - the final report - is printed. The final report is issued to all observers and representatives of candidates. Advantages of using PCOS: - a monitoring tool for counting the results of voting (as a factor preventing the vote fraud) - a tool for instantaneous data on voting results (as a factor of stability) After the completion of voting, the data is sent to the central server of the CEC through secure communication channels.

Pregunta 4c

c. ¿Qué recursos (financieros, humanos, materiales u otros recursos, etc.) se usaron para implementar la iniciativa? (Máximo 200 palabras)
There was a strong political will to establish a new electoral system implemented by the ICT Department of the CEC. The initiative was developed together with international partners. 5816 PCOS were bought by several steps: - 916 PCOS and server premise, server and network hardware were bought by the support of the KOICA (6.150.000 thousand USD) and Embassy of Switzerland (600.000 CHF) in 2015 - 2900 PCOS were bought by the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic (6.380.000 USD) - By the Decree of the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic on August 4, 2016, the Ministry of Finance of the Kyrgyz Republic was instructed to allocate 4.060.000 USD from the means of this EU grant to the CEC in order to buy 2000 PCOS. 25000 members of the electoral commissions around the country are engaged into the implementing of electoral process.

Pregunta 5

La iniciativa debe ser adaptable a otros contextos (por ejemplo, otras ciudades, países o regiones). Es posible que ya exista evidencia de que la iniciativa ha inspirado innovaciones similares en otras instituciones del sector público dentro de un país, región o a nivel global.
a. ¿La iniciativa ha sido transferida a otros contextos?
Si
The PCOS approbation took place during the parliamentary elections in 2015 and the elections of deputies of local parliaments (keneshes) and holding a referendum in 2016. It was also used during the presidential elections in 2017 and has been tested in all types of electoral process. This January it was implemented during the elections of deputies of local parliaments (keneshes).

Pregunta 6

La iniciativa debería poder mantenerse durante un período de tiempo significativo.
a. Describa si la iniciativa es sostenible y cómo (cubriendo aspectos sociales, económicos y ambientales). (Máximo 300 palabras)
On April 23, 2015, the President of the Kyrgyz Republic signed the Law of the Kyrgyz Republic providing for new procedures for citizens' participation in voting and a new system for counting votes at the level of elections of the head of state and deputies of the parliament. With the adoption of the Law of the Kyrgyz Republic on January 21, 2016, a new electoral model was introduced into the election process of deputies of local keneshes. On this basis, in spring and winter of 2016 elections were held for 444 local city and rural keneshes of the Kyrgyz Republic (33 in March-May and 411 in December). On October 31, 2016, the Constitutional Law of the Kyrgyz Republic «On the Referendum of the Kyrgyz Republic» was signed. The most important component of the bill was the introduction of a new electoral model using biometric identification technologies for voters and automatic vote counting in the process of holding a referendum. Unification of procedures at all levels of elections and referenda is important for voters and for the system of election commissions organizing referenda. Unified rules and procedures make the election and referendum process more clear and understandable and most importantly reliable for voters, clearer for the organizers of voting - election commissions. Unified rules and procedures also make it possible to combine voting of different types and their simultaneous conduct. The practice of holding voting on the same day, applied throughout the world, became possible in a new format in Kyrgyzstan. An important advantage of this practice is the savings of financial costs, temporary and human resources for conducting voting in the future.
b. Describa si la iniciativa es sostenible en términos de durabilidad en tiempo actual y cómo es sostenible. (Máximo 300 palabras)
PCOS has been used during following elections and 1 referendum: 1) October, 2015 - elections for Jogorku Kenesh of the Kyrgyz Republic (Parliament) 2) March, 2016 - Elections for Local Keneshes 3) May, 2016 - Elections for Local Keneshes 4) December, 2016 - Elections for Local Keneshes 5) December, 2016 - Referendum 6) January, 2017- Elections for Local Keneshes 7) May, 2017- Elections for Local Keneshes 8) September, 2017- Elections for Local Keneshes 9) October, 2017 - Elections for Presidential Elections 10) January, 2018 - Elections for Local Keneshes

Pregunta 7

La iniciativa debe haber pasado por una evaluación formal que muestre alguna evidencia del impacto en la mejora de la vida de las personas
a. ¿La iniciativa ha sido evaluada formalmente?
Si
Si la respuesta es “Sí”, describa cómo fue evaluada la iniciativa (Máximo 200 palabras)
The participation of international representatives in observing the preparation and conduct of elections is one of the important measures to ensure openness and transparency of elections. In order to ensure transparency during the organization and conduct of the elections and compliance with international obligations on electoral standards, the Constitutional Law of the Kyrgyz Republic, observers from the candidates, political parties, public organizations and mass media are also provided by an opportunity to observe the progress of preparing and conducting elections. For example, last evaluation was implemented by the representatives of 57 international organizations from 59 countries accredited as international observers during presidential elections in 2017 with a total of 773 international observers. On October 15, 2017, on the day of the election of the President of the Kyrgyz Republic, 18,823 observers also participated in the observation of the voting process, including 9599 public observers and 9224 observers from presidential candidates.
b. Describa el resultado de la evaluación sobre el impacto de la iniciativa. (Máximo 200 palabras)
International observers of the Commonwealth of Independent States headed by the Chairman of itsExecutive Committee Mr. Lebedev have declared: «So far, no technical means for conducting elections have been introduced in any of the CIS republics so massively. This is moving forward». He also noted that the election of the President of Kyrgyzstan was conducted in accordance with the electoral legislation. Rashid Alimov, Secretary-General of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization: «The election of the President of Kyrgyzstan met the requirements of the country's electoral legislation and international obligations. The elections were democratically open. It was important that work has been carried out on the delivery of PCOS to hard-to-reach high-mountain areas, mechanisms for the online transmission of voting data have been introduced. It was important to mobilize team of almost 25000 people in the election commissions. And you did it». The delegation of the A-WEB noted that the observers were impressed by the advanced IT specialists and highly appreciated the introduction of the information electoral system's application. It was found that the live publication of data on appearance and results on the official page of the CEC was very important for establishing and maintaining voters' confidence in the new system.
c. Describa los indicadores utilizados. (Máximo 200 palabras)
- the right of a citizen to elect and be elected - freedom of elections on the basis of universal, equal and direct suffrage in a secret ballot - open and transparent nature of elections - judicial and other protection of electoral rights and freedoms - public and international observation of elections - professionalism of the electoral commissions

Pregunta 8

La iniciativa debe demostrar que, dentro de lo posible, ha involucrado a diversos actores, como por ejemplo otras instituciones, la sociedad civil o el sector privado.
a. La Agenda para el Desarrollo 2030 pone énfasis en la colaboración, el compromiso, la coordinación, las alianzas y la inclusión. Describa qué partes interesadas participaron en el diseño, la implementación y la evaluación de la iniciativa. Por favor, también resaltar sus roles y contribuciones (Máximo 300 palabras)
The decision of the National Sustainable Development Council of the Kyrgyz Republic of April 25, 2014 and the Constitutional Law of the Kyrgyz Republic «On Elections of the President of the Kyrgyz Republic and Deputies of the Jogorku Kenesh (Parliament) of the Kyrgyz Republic» were adopted. Therefore, Kyrgyz Republic has a strong political will to introduce a new electoral model. A-WEB provided consultative support in establishing contacts with appropriate IT companies, providing technical advice, training of the staff. KOICA, EU, Embassy of Switzerland and Government of the Kyrgyz Republic provided financial support.

Pregunta 9

a. Describa las lecciones claves aprendidas, y cualquier otra opinión que usted tenga para mejorar aún más la iniciativa (Máximo 300 palabras)
Consistent and effective changes in the electoral process have led to that citizens observed true figures of participation and voting results of the population without falsification and the use of administrative resources as a result of the elections of 2015-2017. This was another step forward in enhancing stability in the country and recognizing the electoral process in Kyrgyzstan as successful and competitive by the international community. CEC has to focus on targeted ensuring of electoral rights, raising the level of legal culture of the population and participants in the electoral process, improving the electoral legislation, increasing the competence of election commissions, strengthening interaction with executive authorities and local self-government.

Volver a la lista

Favor esperar...