Basic Info

Por favor revise antes de enviar

Información del nominado

Información institucional

País Tailandia
Nombre de la Institución National Health Security Office
Tipo de Institución Agencia Pública
Nivel administrativo Nacional
Nombre de la Iniciativa The National Antidote Project of Thailand
Años operacionales del proyecto 9
Página web de la institución https://www.nhso.go.th/eng/FrontEnd/index.aspx

Pregunta 1: Acerca de la iniciativa

¿Se trata de una iniciativa del sector público? Si

Pregunta 2: Categorías

¿Es la iniciativa relevante para una de las categorías de UNPSA? Entregando servicios inclusivos y equitativos para todos
UNPSACriteria
No se encontraron artículos

Pregunta 3: Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

¿La iniciativa es relevante para alguno(s) de los 17 ODS? Si
¿Para cuáles de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) y de sus metas es más relevante la iniciativa?
3 Salud y Bienestar
¿Para qué meta(s) de los ODS especificados anteriormente es relevante la iniciativa?
3.8 Lograr la cobertura sanitaria universal, en particular la protección contra los riesgos financieros, el acceso a servicios de salud esenciales de calidad y el acceso a medicamentos y vacunas seguros, eficaces, asequibles y de calidad para todos

Pregunta 4: Fecha de Implementacióm

¿Se ha implementado la iniciativa durante dos años o más? Si
Proporcione la fecha de implementación 01 oct. 2010

Pregunta 5: Socios

¿Las Naciones Unidas o algún organismo de las Naciones Unidas ha participado en esta iniciativa? No
¿Qué agencia de Naciones Unidas estuvo involucrada?
Por favor proporcione detalles

Pregunta 6: Participación previa

1. ¿Ha presentado la iniciativa una solicitud para su consideración en los últimos 3 años (2017-2019)? No

Pregunta 7: Premios UNPSA

¿La iniciativa ha ganado ya un Premio de Naciones Unidas al Servicio Público? No

Pregunta 8: Otros Premios

¿Ha ganado la iniciativa algún otro Premio al Servicio Público? No

Pregunta 9: ¿Cómo se enteró de UNPSA?

¿Cómo se enteró de UNPSA? UN

Pregunta 10: Consentimiento de validación

Doy mi consentimiento para contactar personas y entidades relevantes para preguntar sobre la iniciativa con fines de validación. Si

Pregunta 1: Acerca de la iniciativa

¿Se trata de una iniciativa del sector público? Si

Pregunta 2: Categorías

¿Es la iniciativa relevante para una de las categorías de UNPSA? Entregando servicios inclusivos y equitativos para todos
UNPSACriteria
No se encontraron artículos

Pregunta 3: Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

¿La iniciativa es relevante para alguno(s) de los 17 ODS? Si
¿Para cuáles de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) y de sus metas es más relevante la iniciativa?
3 Salud y Bienestar
¿Para qué meta(s) de los ODS especificados anteriormente es relevante la iniciativa?
3.8 Lograr la cobertura sanitaria universal, en particular la protección contra los riesgos financieros, el acceso a servicios de salud esenciales de calidad y el acceso a medicamentos y vacunas seguros, eficaces, asequibles y de calidad para todos

Pregunta 4: Fecha de Implementacióm

¿Se ha implementado la iniciativa durante dos años o más? Si
Proporcione la fecha de implementación 01 oct. 2010

Pregunta 5: Socios

¿Las Naciones Unidas o algún organismo de las Naciones Unidas ha participado en esta iniciativa? No
¿Qué agencia de Naciones Unidas estuvo involucrada?
Por favor proporcione detalles

Pregunta 6: Participación previa

1. ¿Ha presentado la iniciativa una solicitud para su consideración en los últimos 3 años (2017-2019)? No

Pregunta 7: Premios UNPSA

¿La iniciativa ha ganado ya un Premio de Naciones Unidas al Servicio Público? No

Pregunta 8: Otros Premios

¿Ha ganado la iniciativa algún otro Premio al Servicio Público? No

Pregunta 9: ¿Cómo se enteró de UNPSA?

¿Cómo se enteró de UNPSA? UN

Pregunta 10: Consentimiento de validación

Doy mi consentimiento para contactar personas y entidades relevantes para preguntar sobre la iniciativa con fines de validación. Si

Pregunta 1: Acerca de la iniciativa

¿Se trata de una iniciativa del sector público? Si

Pregunta 2: Categorías

¿Es la iniciativa relevante para una de las categorías de UNPSA? Entregando servicios inclusivos y equitativos para todos
UNPSACriteria
No se encontraron artículos

Pregunta 3: Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

¿La iniciativa es relevante para alguno(s) de los 17 ODS? Si
¿Para cuáles de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) y de sus metas es más relevante la iniciativa?
3 Salud y Bienestar
¿Para qué meta(s) de los ODS especificados anteriormente es relevante la iniciativa?
3.8 Lograr la cobertura sanitaria universal, en particular la protección contra los riesgos financieros, el acceso a servicios de salud esenciales de calidad y el acceso a medicamentos y vacunas seguros, eficaces, asequibles y de calidad para todos

Pregunta 4: Fecha de Implementacióm

¿Se ha implementado la iniciativa durante dos años o más? Si
Proporcione la fecha de implementación 01 oct. 2010

Pregunta 5: Socios

¿Las Naciones Unidas o algún organismo de las Naciones Unidas ha participado en esta iniciativa? No
¿Qué agencia de Naciones Unidas estuvo involucrada?
Por favor proporcione detalles

Pregunta 6: Participación previa

1. ¿Ha presentado la iniciativa una solicitud para su consideración en los últimos 3 años (2017-2019)? No

Pregunta 7: Premios UNPSA

¿La iniciativa ha ganado ya un Premio de Naciones Unidas al Servicio Público? No

Pregunta 8: Otros Premios

¿Ha ganado la iniciativa algún otro Premio al Servicio Público? No

Pregunta 9: ¿Cómo se enteró de UNPSA?

¿Cómo se enteró de UNPSA? UN

Pregunta 10: Consentimiento de validación

Doy mi consentimiento para contactar personas y entidades relevantes para preguntar sobre la iniciativa con fines de validación. Si

Nomination form

Questions/Answers

Pregunta 1

Describa brevemente la iniciativa, qué situación o reto aborda y especificar los objetivos. (Máximo 300 palabras)
According to the Global Health Observatory Data, over 160,000 death worldwide were caused by unintentional poisonings in 2016 especially in low- and middle-incomes countries. The mortality rate was 2.7, 1.8, 1.5, 1.1 0.7 and 0.6 in Africa, South East Asia, Eastern Mediterranean, Western Pacific, Europe and USA respectively. In Thailand, before 2010, many patients suffered from hazardous substances. Particularly in 2006, in Nan province, there was massive outbreak of botulism due to contaminated home-canned bamboo shoots which effected 209 patients, 134 were in a severe stage with paralysis, 42 of them required mechanical ventilation. There was no botulinum antitoxin available at that time. Fortunately, due to the help of WHO, many vials of botulinum antitoxin were sent to Thailand from USA, UK, Japan and Canada within 6 weeks after the brake of the issue. There were an inefficient antidote stock system and inefficient delivery system at any health care level. Many healthcare workers were lack of skills and experiences for diagnosis and treatment due to rare case context and result in delay treatment, suboptimal management and increase the complication and mortality. National Health Security Office (NHSO) tried to encourage many stake holders, such as toxicologists from Ramathibodi poison Center, The Thai Red Cross Society (TRCS), The Government Pharmaceutical Organization (GPO) and the Ministry of Public Health (MOPH) to work together as the Orphan Drugs and drug Shortage Steering Committee to increase the access to antidotes and essential orphan drugs. The responsibility of this committee is as follow: 1) to develop the system of antidote selection, stockpile and delivery system 2) consultant system 3) health care worker training 4) community prevention and protection. It has given rise to starting the new benefit package, The National Antidote Project of Thailand (NAPT), in 2010.

Pregunta 2

Explicar cómo está alineada la iniciativa con la categoría seleccionada (Máximo 100 palabras)
Although Antidotes are enrolled in WHO list of essential medicines, the pharmaceutical industries pay no intention to produce these medicines due to unpredictable demand and low profit margin result in antidote shortage in the worldwide. To manage the system needs, NHSO takes action to invest in the National antidote project to assure health security for all in Thailand. Not only in Thailand, some antidotes were sent to save lives in other countries as well e.g. 200 vials of Methylene blue were sent to Taiwan for methemoglobinemia treatment, 4 vials of botulinum antitoxin were sent to treat botulism in Nigeria.

Pregunta 3

a. Verificar a qué ODS y meta(s) apoya esta iniciativa y describa concretamente cómo esta iniciativa ha contribuido a la implementación del ODS indicado. (Máximo 200 palabras)
Since the Sustainable Development Goals adopted by all United Nation member states in 2015, it becomes the main duty of Thai government and NHSO to ensure healthy lives and promoting the well-being at all ages as states in SDG. The work of NHSO to increase the access to essential medicines is not cover only high cost medicines. It’s also included antidotes and anti-venom. To manage the system, these medicines are enlisted in the National list of essential medicines (NLEM) of Thailand by the NLEM sub-committee and become the benefit package for all. There are more collaborative among many stakeholders while health information system and budget for the antidote procurement are supported by NHSO. Some antidotes are manufacture by Thai Red Cross Society or imported by GPO and Pharmaceutical industries, Ramathibodi Poison Center take action as a 7 days 24 hours consultant team for treatment and healthcare worker trainer. Result in the increasing of number of patients access to antidotes from 49 in 2011 to 6,917 in 2017.
b. Describa qué hace que esta iniciativa sea sostenible en término social, económico y del medio ambiente. (Máximo 100 palabras)
The The National Antidote Project of Thailand (NAPT) contained all stakeholder related to antidote supply chain. These supply chain including drug selection, drug production and procurement, drug distribution and drug use. The Orphan Drugs and drug Shortage Steering Committee was the center to established the system of antidote selection, stockpile and delivery system, consultant system, health care worker training, community prevention and protection. NHSO have played the role to add antidotes to medical benefit package and support budget continuous for 9 years. This structure make sustainable of NAPT.

Pregunta 4

a. Explicar cómo la iniciativa ha abordado un déficit significativo en la gobernanza, la administración pública o el servicio público en el contexto de un de país o región. (Máximo 200 palabras)
In Thailand, before 2010, many patients suffered from hazardous substances. Particularly in 2006, in Nan province, there was massive outbreak of botulism due to contaminated home-canned bamboo shoots which effected 209 patients, 134 were in a severe stage with paralysis, 42 of them required mechanical ventilation. There was no botulinum antitoxin available at that time. Fortunately, due to the help of WHO, many vials of botulinum antitoxin were sent to Thailand from USA, UK, Japan and Canada within 6 weeks after the brake of the issue. There were an inefficient antidote stock system and inefficient delivery system at any health care level. Many healthcare workers were lack of skills and experiences for diagnosis and treatment due to rare case context and result in delay treatment, sub-optimal management and increase the complication and mortality.
b. Describa cómo su iniciativa aborda la desigualdad de género en el contexto del país. (Máximo 100 palabras)
NHSO added antidote to medical benefit package under universal coverage scheme. National antidote project under universal coverage scheme covered all people in Thailand. Not only in Thailand, some antidotes were sent to save lives in other countries as well e.g. 200 vials of Methylene blue were sent to Taiwan for methemoglobinemia treatment, 4 vials of botulinum antitoxin were sent to treat botulism in Nigeria.
c. Describa quiénes fueron los grupos receptores a beneficiarse de la iniciativa, y explicar cómo la iniciativa mejoró las condiciones de estos grupos. (Máximo 200 palabras)
National antidote project under universal coverage scheme covered all people in Thailand. Due to the collaboration among many stakeholders. The Result of The National Antidote Project of Thailand are as followed: 1) The government policy was strong and Annual national budgets allocated full funding to the NHSO to ensure adequate supply of 17 antidotes and sustain covered all Thai and others in Thailand. 2) The cumulative number of patients access to antidote and antivenoms is 27,436 patients 3) The survival rate without complicated is 74.4% 4) Total cost saving especially for the antivenoms procurement is reduce to 40% when compare with the antivenoms procurement budget before 2013

Pregunta 5

a. Describir cómo se implementó la iniciativa incluyendo desarrollos y pasos clave, actividades de monitoreo y evaluación y la cronología.(300 palabras)
The National Antidote Project of Thailand is processed by the Orphan Drugs and drug Shortage Steering Committee under the Board of the NHSO to increase the access to antidotes and essential orphan drugs. The responsibility of this committee is as follow: 1) to develop the system of antidote selection, stockpile and delivery system 2) consultant system 3) health care worker training 4) community prevention and protection. The implementation processes are: 1)Planning the Antidote selection, Procurement and distribution by the committee 2)GPO and TRCS act on antidote procurement. All antidotes and antivenoms are procured at central level, dived into 3 groups depend on the characteristic of antidote and distributed to each hospital depend on the criteria made by the committee. 3)NHSO response for the Health Information System. Geographic Information System or GIS was applied to the web-based application to control stockpile as a real time and support the decision making for the treatment plan of doctors. 4)There are now antidote networking completed in 13 NHSO’s regions that cover for all in Thailand.
b. Explicar claramente los obstáculos encontrados y cómo de solucionaron. (100 palabras)
1.The shelf-life of antidote is too short and there are still be the stockout of some raw materials result in stockout of antidotes. TRCS try to manufacture many items including study on the long-term stability of them. 2.Because of rare case context but high severity, quality of treatment is very important. The auditing system and training program have been established. 3.All Antidotes must be bought with the minimum orders, some of them are expired without usage whereas there are the needs in other area. Information sharing system and antidote pooled procurement system are the key to solve this problem.

Pregunta 6

a. Explicar de qué manera(s) la iniciativa es innovadora en el contexto de su país o region. (Máximo 100 palabras)
The NAPT is innovation to manage the access to antidotes and support rational use of antidotes. The distribution of antidotes is depended on the characteristic of them and registered all stock information in the web-based registry program. In addition, the geographic information system is applied in this program, which shows an on-line stock. Therefore, each hospital, especially in remote areas, could make the treatment plan more efficiency, as well as referring the patient to the higher hospital. If not, they could request for the antidotes from the near hospitals.
b. Describa, si fuere relevante, cómo la iniciativa se inspiró en iniciativas exitosas de otras regions, países o localidades. (Máximo 100 palabras)
The web-based registry program with geographic information system which shows an on-line stock was key principle to apply in this project. When people exposed toxicant, hospital can search location of antidote located using this web-based registry program. Hospital will contacts hospital which were antidote stockpile and ask for refer patients to antidote or antidote to patients depend on potential of hospital. NHSO support expenditure to refer patient to drug or refer drug to patient.

Pregunta 7

a. ¿Su organización tiene conocimiento si la iniciativa ha sido transferida y/o adaptada a otros contextos (por ejemplo: otras ciudades, países o regiones)? Si así fuera, favor explicar dónde y cómo. (Máximo 200 palabras)
During 9 years of implementation, our results were published in the international journal e.g. Improving access to antidotes and antivenoms, Thailand. The Bulletin of the WHO 2018 (download at http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/96/12/18-217075/en/) , Cyanide poisoning in Thailand before and after estrablishment of the National Antidote Project in Clinical Toxicology volume 56,2018-issue 4 (down load at https:/www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15563650.2017.1370098). Besides these pulication, there is a new initiative on collaborative among WHO SERO, member states and NHSO Thailand to start the antidote pooled procurement by the existing system in Thailand. The Ramathibodi Poison Center presented the NAPT in the ASEAN Social Security Association meeting in Bruni last September 2018.
b. Si la iniciativa aún no ha sido transferida/adaptada a otros contextos, favor describir el potencial de transferencia.
This project was published in the international journal.

Pregunta 8

¿Qué recursos específicos (financieros, humanos ú otros) se utilizaron para implementar la iniciativa? (Máximo 100 palabras)
1.The government policy that allocate continuous budget to the NHSO to ensure adequate supply of antidotes covered all Thai and non-Thai in Thailand after Antidotes were announced as the new benefit package. 2. All stake holders related to antidote supply chain were encouraged to own this system. 3. There are international, national and regional antidote networking with the new familiar antidote registry program and the support from Ramathibodi poison center. 4. The collaborative from the private industrial companies for joining the accident prevention.
b. En términos financiaros e institucionales, explicar qué hace que esta iniciativa sea sostenible a través del tiempo. (Máximo 100 palabras)
The importance factors to sustain the NAPT are 1.The government policy that allocate continuous budget to the NHSO to ensure adequate supply of antidotes covered all Thai and non-Thai in Thailand after Antidotes were announced as the new benefit package. 2. All stake holders are encouraged to own this system. 3. There are inter and intra antidote networking with the new familiar antidote registry program and the support from Ramathibodi poison center. 5. The collaborative from the private industrial companies for joining the accident prevention.

Pregunta 9

a. ¿Esta iniciativa ha sido evaluada formalmente, ya sea interna o externamente?
Si
b. Describa cómo fue evaluada y por quién. (Máximo 100 palabras)
The NAPT are evaluated by 2 systems including 1) The Internal monitoring system of NHSO and 2) The External auditing system by the Ramathibodi poison Center. The main purpose of this is to assure the rational use of antidotes in each antidotes networking.
c. Describa los indicadores y herramientas utilizadas. (Máximo 100 palabras)
The NAPT are evaluated by 2 systems including 1. The Internal monitoring system of NHSO: All information are reported at http://drug.nhso.go.th/Antidotes/ e.g. 1) Report of the total use of antidotes, 2)Report of the individual use of patient from each hospital report of stock in each items of antidote / hospital 2.The External auditing system by the Ramathibodi poison Center. The main purpose of this is to assure the rational use of antidotes in each antidotes networking.
d. ¿Cuáles fueron los principals hallazgos de la evaluación (por ejemplo: la adecuación de los recursos movilizados para la iniciativa, la calidad de implementación y los desafíos enfrentados, los resultados principales, la sostenibilidad de la iniciativa, los impactos) y cómo se utiliza esta información para informar sobre la implementación de la iniciativa. (Máximo 200 palabras)
1. The cumulative number of patients access to antidote and antivenoms is 27,436 patients 2. The survival rate without complicated is 74.4% 3. Total cost saving especially for the antivenoms procurement is reduce to 40% when compare with the antivenoms procurement budget before 2013. 4. The shelf-life of antidote is too short and there are still be the stockout of some raw materials result in stockout of antidotes. 5. The appropriate use of antidotes was 90%. 6. Cyanide and hydrogen sulfide are common causes. Although these were hardly occurred, the severity is high.

Pregunta 10

Describa cómo la iniciativa se esfuerza por trabajar de manera integrada dentro de su panorama institucional – por ejemplo, ¿cómo funciona la iniciativa tanto horizontal como verticalmente a través de los diferentes niveles o escalafones de gobierno? (Máximo 200 palabras)
1. The Orphan Drugs and drug Shortage Steering Committee had role for establishing the system of antidote selection, stockpile and delivery system, consultant system, health care worker training and community prevention and protection. 2. Thai Food and Drug administration (Thai FDA) had role for pre-marketing control included control of manufacturing facilities, product quality before product-launch to the market. 3. NLEM sub-committee had role for Antidotes selection in NLEM 4. NHSO had role for containing antidote lists in Medical Benefit Packages 5. GPO and TRCS had role for antidote production and procurement. 6. Ramathibodi Poison Center had role for consultation for poison treatment to healthcare worker and training 7. MOPH and hospital had role for provision of poison treatment

Pregunta 11

La Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible pone énfasis en la colaboración, compromiso, asociaciones y la inclusión. Describa qué partes interesadas participaron en el diseño, implementación y evaluación; y cómo se llevó a cabo este compromiso. (Máximo 200 palabras)
The NAPT contained all stakeholder related to antidote supply chain. These supply chain including drug selection, drug production and procurement, drug distribution and drug use. The Orphan Drugs and drug Shortage Steering Committee was the center to established the system of antidote selection, stockpile and delivery system, consultant system, health care worker training, community prevention and protection. This structure had high effectiveness to antidote management and solving of antidote shortage. 7 days 24 hours consultation system and health worker training by Ramathibodi Poison Center can increasing of number of patients access to antidote and improve rational use of antidotes.

Pregunta 12

Describa las lecciones clave aprendidas y cómo su organización planea mejorar la iniciativa. (Máximo 200 palabras)
1.All stakeholder related to antidote supply chain including drug selection, drug production and procurement, drug distribution and drug use is one key success factor to establish antidote system. The Orphan Drugs and drug Shortage Steering Committee is important structure to antidote management and solving of antidote shortage. 2.Antidotes have to contain in national list of essential medicines and health benefit package because government will must continuous support budget for antidotes procurement and management. 3.Local producers including GPO and TRCS are the key component to assure available of antidotes. Central procurement is powerful strategy to collect antidote needs from all health facilities and negotiates with suppliers 4.Web-based registry program with GIS support hospital to make the treatment plan more efficiency, as well as referring the patient to the higher hospital and request for the antidotes from the near hospitals. 5.7 days 24 hours consultation system and health worker training by Ramathibodi Poison Center can increasing of number of patients access to antidote and improve rational use of antidotes

Volver a la lista

Favor esperar...