Questions/Answers
Question 1
Veuillez décrire brièvement l’initiative, le problème ou défi qu’elle cherche à résoudre, et spécifiez ses objectifs. (300 mots maximum)
Development of Public and Institutional Policies to Support Labour Inclusion, Access to Justice, with processes and procedures for counselling, awareness raising and supervision in cases of Persons with Disabilities (PcD)
It involves a Professional Team that intervenes and media in the development, design and implementation of activities and proposals that enientiate and attend to Diversity.
Labour Inclusion, Training of Peers References (in areas of Violence, Gender and Family), Sign Language Interpretation, Training of Peace Judges for PcD Actions, Awareness in the Field of Adoption of Children with Disabilities, Accessibility Information.
All in conjunction with Gender and Ethnic Policies (Interculturality).
Training in the care of Users with Disabilities
Question 2
Veuillez expliquer en quoi l’initiative est corrélée à la catégorie sélectionnée. (100 mots maximum)
It guarantees inclusive processes that address problems typical of gender gaze, interculturality, and functional diversity (disability).
Access to Justice, Principles of Equity, and Combats Discrimination.
It installs Public Policies on the subject and obliges the development of compliance regulatory frameworks guaranteeing Rights.
Question 3
a. Veuillez spécifier quels sont les ODD et les cibles que l’initiative soutient, et décrivez concrètement comment l’initiative a contribué à leur mise en œuvre. (200 mots maximum)
Equality, Inclusion, Non-Discrimination, Rights (Human and Labour)
Development of an innovative Public Policy, which begins to be replicated as a model of action.
It has allowed the employment inclusion of Persons with Disabilities, new Regulatory Frameworks, training and training spaces; inspired by its replication by other institutions and bodies (public and private).
It has reduced social conflict on the subject, and has transparent job access contests.
The work has been recognized by groups related to the Inclusion theme, and by the Chamber of Deputies of the Nation.
b. Veuillez décrire ce qui rend l’initiative durable en terme social et environnemental. (100 mots maximum)
It became an Institutional and Public Policy.
Regulatory frameworks were developed to gantatize its application, rights, protocols, etc.
It does not involve differential budgeting.
It is supported by groups and social groups.
Public knowledge results have already been recorded.
By institutionalizing and stipulating as a line of action it transcends subjects and wills of turn.
It is replicable (and there are theoretical, procedural, methodological and results-for-dissemination foundations and regulations).
Training and awareness-raising spaces to foster natural supports (assessment of model and experiences)
Question 4
a. Veuillez expliquer comment l’initiative répond à un déficit important en termes de gouvernance, d’administration publique ou de service public dans le contexte d’un pays ou d’une région donnés. (200 mots maximum)
It is the first proposal of the planned design, with external advice, and formation of support and monitoring equipment in public institutions of the country.
It provides assertive compliance with legal regulatory frameworks, and addresses claims and mobilizations of groups and collectives for the Right to Labour Inclusion, Access to Justice (in Disability), in training officials on Interculturality (in a communion of migrants, intercultural and bilingual/Indigenous Peoples), taking together the attention of gender, cultural (ethnics/Mapuches) and disability.
Awareness-raising and training for the non-segregation, exclusion and discrimination of minority groups and so far excluded.
b. Veuillez expliquer comment votre initiative aborde l’inégalité des genres dans le contexte du pays en question. (100 mots maximum)
Training, Awareness-Raising and Specific Training in Joint Gender, Interculturality and Disability issues, both for labour inclusion and for the legal operator, a done with science and awareness that their resolutions and risks; training for executing agents (the police), and access to information.
c. Veuillez décrire le(s) groupe(s) ciblé(s), et expliquez comment l’initiative a amélioré leur situation. (200 mots maximum)
Persons with Disabilities (Labour Inclusion): opportunity for quality employment, public policies in favor of access to labour rights, and the creation of national frameworks that comply with the Laws that guarantee their opportunities (90 cases)
Persons with Disabilities (user): training to the legal operator in forms of care, notification, safety and hygiene, evacuation protocols, interpretation in Sign Language, creation of referents peers
Indigenous Peoples: training and training of legal operators
Gender: sensitization, armed with attention protocols, creation of even references.
Question 5
a. Veuillez décrire comment l’initiative a été mise en œuvre en incluant les développements et les étapes clés, les activités de suivi et d’évaluation, ainsi que la chronologie. (300 mots)
Proposal Regulatory Approval
Contest Design
Individual and Collective Training, Training and Awareness-Raising Instance
Pre and post inclusion advice
Arming Specific Equipment and External Advisors
Designs and Implementation of Protocols (Inclusion and Care)
Reasonable adequacies or adjustments, case review
Follow-up interviews.
Cross-sectional monitoring (internal and external)
Accompaniment to specific cases (on request)
Dissemination and systematization of proposals, results, etc.
Practices/Simulations/Workshops
b. Veuillez expliquer clairement les obstacles rencontrés et comment ils ont été surpassés. (100 mots)
Prejudice (Awareness Workshops)
Architectural Barriers (Ergonomic Accessibility Protocols)
Linguistics (Sign Language Courses, Augmentive Alternative Communication, Intérpetre Figure and Translator)
Question 6
a. Veuillez expliquer en quoi l’initiative est innovatrice dans le contexte de votre pays ou région. (100 mots maximum)
First adapted and assertive application experience of the theoretical model of Employment with Support in configuring as An Insitucional and Public Policy, combining in the working structure three axes: Gender. Interculturality and Disability, extending Access to Justice to the official and User of the System.
It is the first model he takes as advisors and concerning people with Disabilities.
b. Veuillez décrire, si cela est pertinent, comment l’initiative s’est inspirée d’une autre initiative fructueuse dans d’autres régions, pays ou localités (100 mots maximum)
He only took the Theoretical Model of Employment with Support (Spain) and adapted individual job inclusion experiences, designing a mechanism of his own (appropriate to the regulations and characteristics of the Judiciary), and drawings that combined the frameworks the paradigm of diversity, and institutional will.
We do not know other regional experiences that work on inclusion as public policy at the scale (we talk about 90 cases) and that generates simultaneous policies of Gender and Interculturality.
Question 7
a. A votre connaissance, l’initiative a-t-elle été transposée et/ou adaptée à d’autres contextes (par ex. d’autres villes, pays ou régions) ? Si oui, veuillez expliquer où et comment. (200 mots maximum).
The "Faro Patagonia" Foundation (Rio Negro, Argentina), the Civil Association "Lazos Azules" (Neuquén), the Discar Foundation (Labor Inlcutucus Argentina) and the Munciipality of Andresito (Missions) have taken our model and have begun to design and implement this type of work was recently planned.
It has been highlighted by the Chamber of Deputies of Ela Nación (Argentina) to be taken as an example by and for state agencies, and has been disseminated in International Congresses as quality experience
b. Si l’initiative n’a pas été transposée/adaptée à d’autres contextes, veuillez décrire le potentiel de sa transférabilité.
Having theoretical basis, procedural examples, systematized protocols of action, demonstrative practical results, no need for allocation of significant economic resources, and the possibility of training of references and professionals, is highly viable its replica.
Question 8
a. Quelles ressources (financières, humaines ou autres) ont-elles été utilisées pour mettre en œuvre l’initiative ? (100 mots maximum)
Human Resources: 2 External Advisors with Experience and area professionals already formed within the Judiciary (reassignment of tasks)/Possibility of accessing internal and external training spaces
Economic Resources: not significant (only the stage of advice and external evaluation) / payment of two advisers (the other expenditureps are budgeted in and from the institutional own areas)
Materials: in some specific case, acquisition of ergonomic material
b. Veuillez expliquer ce qui rend l’initiative durable dans le temps, en termes financiers et institutionnels. (100 mots maximum)
Doesn't need differentiated budget items
It is an experience valued institutionally and by social groups and groups related to the themes (disability, gender, interculturality)
You don't need to make up large work teams (only one 5-person reference)
There are constitutional, legal and regulatory frameworks (national, provincial and institutional) that guarantee the process as a law.
Institutional benchmarks are already being trained and trained in the process.
It is a public institution (does not give bankruptcy)
Question 9
a. L’initiative a-t-elle fait l’objet d’une évaluation formelle interne ou externe ?
Oui
b. Veuillez décrire comment elle a été évaluée et par qui. (100 mots maximum)
The DISCAR Foundation regularly conducts checks and advice, conducts ongoing interviews and follow-up visits (systematized and registered), has a permanent external advisor, and the workshops are already held surveys of assessment/evaluation of instances.
c. Veuillez décrire les indicateurs et les outils utilisés. (100 mots maximum)
Interviews (individual and team)
Surveys (activity assessment)
Supervision (permanent in jobs)
Institutional mail (consultations, requirements, complaints, etc.)
Book of Minutes (of activities and records)
Protocols of Action
Documenting through Minutes- Protocol Agreements, Resolutions, Suggestions and Directives.
Number of cases served (list, contest, income)
d. Quels étaient les conclusions principales de l’évaluation (par exemple l’adéquation des ressources mobilisées pour l’initiative, la qualité de la mise en œuvre et des défis auxquels vous avez été confrontés, les résultats principaux, la durabilité de l’initiative, les impacts) et comment cette information est utilisée pour mettre en place l’initiative. (200 mots)
The assessment of the experience
the breakdown of prejudices and stereotypes
the lack of significant adaptations
the high cup of contests won and exams approved post-entry
non-registration of complaints or negative suggestions in the User Complaint Books
100% of Labour Inclusion cases have been confirmed (after the probationary period)
jury trial with indians
increased application cases for specific areas (mediation, adoption, gender)
dissemination in national and local media of tasks and proposals
Question 10
Veuillez décrire comment l’initiative s’inscrit dans le paysage institutionnel adéquat (par exemple, comment elle se situe par rapport aux agences gouvernementales pertinentes, et comment les relations institutionnelles avec ces dernières ont été menées). (200 mots maximum)
The areas/Units/offices submit the request for the need (work vacancy / attention to a user / specific training) is addressed to the requirement and the need of each area.
The team advises and participates in specific needs framework (does not impose)
Internal regulations are developed
The modes and means of intervention/mediation are coordinated in cases
Question 11
L’agenda 2030 pour le développement durable met l’accent sur la collaboration, l’engagement, les partenariats et l’inclusion. Veuillez décrire quels acteurs ont été engagés dans la conception, la mise en œuvre et l’évaluation de l’initiative et comment cet engagement a eu lieu. (200 mots maximum)
Social Movements, groups and groups were taken into account, and public complaints about the lack of employment opportunities (Labour Inclusion).
Local references, referring professionals, and foundations were cited and invited to screen the processes, with intervention to unions to ensure transparency and support for the inicitives.
A reference with Disability was hired to advise and supervise processes, and gender work was institutionally implemented with the Police, the Discar Foundation, the Office of Access to Justice.
Question 12
Veuillez décrire les leçons clés apportées par cette expérience, et comment votre organisation prévoit d’améliorer l’initiative. (200 mots maximum).
Social Movements, groups and groups were taken into account, and public complaints about the lack of employment opportunities (Labour Inclusion).
Local references, referring professionals, and foundations were cited and invited to screen the processes, with intervention to unions to ensure transparency and support for the inicitives.
A reference with Disability was hired to advise and supervise processes, and gender work was institutionally implemented with the Police, the Discar Foundation, the Office of Access to Justice.